AN IDEOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE "TONG-DIAN" LI BY DU YOU

杜佑《通典礼》的思想研究

基本信息

批准号：
14510394
负责人：
KITAGAWA Toshiaki
金额：
$ 1.15万
依托单位：
TOYAMA NATIONAL COLLEGE OF MARITIME TECHNOLOGY
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2002
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2002 至 2003
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-14510394/
关键词：
Tong-dian 通典 Du You 杜佑 Chinese Historiography

项目摘要

As everybody knows the oldest text of the "Tong-dian" is the Northern Song's edition.(北宗版) First by this edition it is necessary to correct errors of words in the text of Zhonghua Shuju.(中華書局版) For the purpose of this work, I own visited the National Library in Taipei and the National Library in Beijing. As a result of the research of some texts which belong to these Libraries, the words of the "Tong-dian" Li could be confirmed clearly. Then, I looked up Du You's comments from the "Tong-dian" Li, and made a list of its contents in the report. The main points clarified by this research are as follows:1.The most popular text of Zhonghua Shuju is almost correct. However, in this text serious errors are found out. For example, in this text one Du You's comment has not been realized. And the editors of this text have mistaken two different comments for the same comment.2.Du You presents very unique opinions in the "Tong-dian" Li. The total number of his comments is thirty-seven. In the details of the number, Shuo (説) are twenty comments. Yi (議) are twelve comments. Ping (評) are five.3.The content of Shuo is almost the quotation from Confucian Classics, otherwise the quotation from Confucian Classics has been rearranged by Du You.4.The content of Yi is Du You's opinion on the institution of Court etiquette.5.The content of Ping is the criticism of many other Scholar's comments about the institution of Court etiquette.

正如每个人都知道“汤边”的最古老的文字是北方歌曲的版本。（北京版）首先，在此版本中，有必要在中国shuju文本中纠正单词错误。（北京版）为了这项工作，我拥有台北的国家图书馆和北京的国家图书馆。通过研究属于这些库的一些文本的研究，可以清楚地确认“汤钟”的词语。然后，我从“ Tong-Dian” Li的评论中查找了您的评论，并在报告中列出了其内容。这项研究阐明的要点如下：1。中国舒豪最受欢迎的文本几乎是正确的。但是，在本文中发现了严重的错误。例如，在本文中，您的评论尚未实现。本文的编辑将两个不同的评论误认为是同一评论。2.DU您在li中提出了非常独特的意见。他的评论总数为37。在数字的详细信息中，Shuo（理论）是二十条评论。 yi（理论）是十二条评论。 ping（理论）为五。3。shuo的内容几乎是儒家经典的引文，否则儒家经典的引文已被du yourange.4.4. yi的内容是du的意见，您对法院礼节的看法。5。ping的内容是许多其他学者对法院eTquettiquette eTquetequettiquette Indicitionitition of Courtequette eTquettiquette的评论。