权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Corpus and Arcbive-based research on Diachronic Change of Case Usage in the Finnish Language

基于Corpus和Arcbive的芬兰语格用法历时变化研究

基本信息

批准号：
16520235
负责人：
SAKUMA Junichi
金额：
$ 1.42万
依托单位：
Nagoya University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
财政年份：
2004
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2004 至 2007
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-16520235/
关键词：
the Finnish language case language corpus archive diachronic cheap international information exchange Finland

项目摘要

In modem standard Finnish the same set of grammatical cases are available to indicate both the subject and the object. This current case marking pattern has resulted from the diachronic development of the Finnish language. It should be noted that not only the usage but also the syntactic functions of the grammatical cases have diachronically changed. Therefore, considering the diachronic change of the usage and the syntactic functions of these cases would reasonably contribute to the synchronic study of these cases. In this study I have closely investigated the diachronic development of the permissive construction, which means 'to let someone do something'. The purpose of this study is to clear up the historical transition of the usage and the syntactic functions of the grammatical cases in the light of the developmental process of the permissive construction. Material of this study was mainly collected from the archive (Muoto-opin arkisto) of the department of the Finnish language and … More literature of Helsinki University and the language corpus(Kielipankki) of the Finnish -IT-centre for Science. The permissive construction contains an infinitival clause as a complement of the matrix predicate, whose subject is different from the subject of the infinitive. In the Finnish language the semantic subject of an infinitive is either omitted or coded as the grammatical object of the matrix predicate. In the permissive construction, however, the semantic subject of an infinitive serves overtly as the grammatical subject of its own. This difference is very suggestive to the current study. Apparently the case marking pattern of the permissive construction is peculiar. There is, however, a reasonable explanation and it would reveal insight into the synchronic properties of the grammatical cases of the Finnish language. During this study I have written four papers. I have also read two papers at the 22nd Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics and at the 40th annual meeting of Societas Linguistica Europaea. 10. Less

在现代标准芬兰语中，同样的一组语法格可用来表示主语和宾语。这种格标记模式是芬兰语历时发展的结果。值得注意的是，格的用法和句法功能都发生了历时性的变化。因此，考察这些格的历时变化和句法功能，将有助于对这些格的共时研究。在本研究中，我仔细考察了“让某人做某事”的容许结构的历时发展。本文的研究目的是结合允许构式的发展过程，梳理语法格的用法和句法功能的历史变迁。本研究的材料主要收集自芬兰语系的档案（Muoto-opin arkisto）， ...更多信息赫尔辛基大学的文献和芬兰IT科学中心的语言语料库（Kielipankki）。允许结构包含一个不定式从句作为矩阵谓词的补语，其主语与不定式的主语不同。在芬兰语中，不定式的语义主语要么被省略，要么被编码为矩阵谓词的语法宾语。然而，在容许结构中，不定式的语义主语公开地充当其自身的语法主语。这种差异对目前的研究非常有启发性。显然，允许结构的格标记模式是独特的。然而，有一个合理的解释，它将揭示洞察芬兰语的语法情况的共时特性。在这次研究中，我写了四篇论文。我还在第22届斯堪的纳维亚语言学会议和第40届欧洲语言学会年会上读到了两篇论文。10.少