Theorizing Interactive Administrative Law Thorough Legal Assistance and Building Academic Network for Multifaceted Comparison between Japanese Administrative Law and Administrative Law of Other Developed and Developing Countries

1.在全球化和市场化的背景下，援助国的法律和受援国的法律都受到社会变迁的影响而发生变化和转化。我们不应认为法律（制度）与文化（社会）对立的法律的二元论是永久性的。我们应当关注法律（制度）与文化（社会）之间的关系变迁，研究法律（制度）与文化（社会）之间的互动关系。2.我们可以想到行政法的两种模式。一种是行政法的基本观点在于，行政机关的活动如果侵犯了公民的权利，就必须受到法院的审查和控制。另一种是以公民参与、信息公开、行政程序等为目标的公共行政合理公正模式，在确定行政法法律的援助项目时，应发展两种模式关系的理论，并通过法律的援助进行比较行政法研究。

1. Law of donor countries and law of recipient countries both are subject to change and transformation by social change under globalization and marketizaiton We shouldn't consider that the legal dualism of the confrontation between law(institution) and culture(society) is permanent. We should pay attention to the changes relations between law (institution) and culture (society) and study the interaction between law (institution) and culture (society). 2. We can think of two models of administrative law. One is the model in which the essential point of administrative law consists in that activities of administrative agency must be reviewed and controlled by courts if they violate the citizen's right. Another is the model in which reasonable and fair public administration is aimed by citizen participation, information disclosure, and administrative procedure and so on. We should develop the theory on relation between two models when we decide the legal assistance project for administrative law and study comparative administrative law through legal assistance.