Relativizing the concept of exclusive right in intellectual property law

知识产权法中专有权概念的相对化

• 批准号: 20730086
• 负责人: KOJIMA Ryu
• 金额: $ 3万
• 依托单位: Kyushu University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B)
• 财政年份: 2008
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 2008 至 2010
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-20730086/
• 关键词: 知的財産法; 独占権; 権利制限; 媒介業者; 間接侵害; 知的財産権; 中間業者; 二次責任

This research conducted a theoretical analysis on relativizing the concept of exclusive right in intellectual property law. It picked up several industrial fields, where the configuration of stakeholders and their market structures were identified. The research tried to clarify whether an exclusive right in intellectual property law will enhance the interests of certain key stakeholders.During the research project, "Google Books" has become a global issue. This case has the potential implication of relativizing the concept of exclusive right, namely the transition from "opt-in" to "opt-out" mechanism of intellectual property law, therefore, the research made an intensive analysis of this particular issue.Through this research, the following issues have been clarified. When we set a policy goal of stabilizing the economic foundations of stakeholders in a cultural sector, copyright law is not the only policy choice. In an interaction with other cultural policy measures including government funding for arts, and private/corporate philanthropy, how to set up optimal "portfolios of cultural policy" should be seriously taken into consideration in order to achieve normative policy goals.Considering the relevant areas and the configuration of stakeholders of intellectual property law, we cannot give a proper answer regarding the appropriate level of exclusive right if we only observe problems within limited legal fields, namely intellectual property law. It has become clear that locating intellectual property within cultural policy is becoming increasingly important.

本文对知识产权法中专有权概念的相对化进行了理论分析。它选择了几个工业领域，确定了利益攸关方的配置及其市场结构。该研究试图澄清知识产权法中的专有权是否会增强某些关键利益相关者的利益。在研究项目期间，“谷歌图书”已经成为一个全球性的问题。本案具有将专有权概念相对化的潜在含义，即知识产权法的“选择加入”机制向“选择退出”机制的过渡，因此，本研究对这一特殊问题进行了深入分析，通过研究，澄清了以下问题。当我们设定一个稳定文化部门利益相关者经济基础的政策目标时，版权法并不是唯一的政策选择。在与其他文化政策措施（包括政府资助艺术和私人/企业慈善事业）的互动中，应认真考虑如何建立最佳的“文化政策组合”，以实现规范性政策目标。考虑到知识产权法的相关领域和利益相关者的配置，如果只从有限的法律的领域，即知识产权法的角度来观察问题，我们就不能对专有权的适当水平作出恰当的回答。很明显，在文化政策中确定知识产权的位置正变得越来越重要。

项目成果

Contemporary Issues in Japanese Copyright Law: Copyright Limitations and Exceptions & Indirect Copyright Infringement

日本版权法的当代问题：版权限制与例外

• 发表时间: 2010
• 作者: 小島立;ほか;小島立;小島立;上野達弘=小島立;小島立;小島立;上野達弘=小島立;小島立;小島立;Ryu Kojima;小島立;小島立;Ryu Kojima;Ryu Kojima;Ryu Kojima;Ryu Kojima;小島立;Ryu Kojima;Ryu Kojima;Ryu Kojima;Ryu Kojima;Ryu Kojima
• 通讯作者: Ryu Kojima

Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property

非物质文化遗产与知识产权

• 发表时间: 2009
• 作者: Ryu Kojima;etc.;小島立;小島立;小島立;小島立(共著);Ryu Kojima(共著)/Toshiyuki Kono(編集)
• 通讯作者: Ryu Kojima(共著)/Toshiyuki Kono(編集)

条約における権利制限

对条约权利的限制

• 发表时间: 2008
• 期刊: 著作権研究 35号
• 作者: 大石岳史;佐川立昌;中澤篤志;倉爪亮;池内克史;油井孔兵・寺内允・金丸周司・有坂文雄;島並良;中野俊一郎=阮柏挺;大杉謙一;久保田隆;小島立
• 通讯作者: 小島立

Applicable Law in Intellectual Property Law

知识产权法适用法律

• 发表时间: 2010
• 作者: Yap Moh Lan;Nakao Tomoko;Nagao Tatsuya;Kanamaru Shuii;Arisaka Fumio;弥永真生;Ryu Kojima
• 通讯作者: Ryu Kojima

Contemporary Problems in Japanese Intellectual Property Law: Copyright Limitations and Exceptions, Indirect Copyright Infringement, and Selected Issues Related to Private International Law

日本知识产权法的当代问题：版权限制与例外、间接版权侵权以及与国际私法相关的精选问题

• 发表时间: 2011
• 期刊: Japanese Yearbook of International Law Vol.53
• 作者: 野田崇;野田崇;野田崇;野田崇;Ryu Kojima
• 通讯作者: Ryu Kojima