Psychoanalysis and Autobiography. A Comparative Study of Sigmund Freud and Lou Andreas-Salome

本研究通过比较西格蒙德·弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud，1856-1939)和作家卢·安德烈亚斯-萨洛姆(Lou Andreas-Salome，1861-1937)在精神分析运动中的作品，考察了心理分析与自传/传记作为文学体裁之间的互补或对立关系。此外，考虑到弗洛伊德的记忆理论，这项研究调查了精神分析是否使两位作家转变了一种“生活叙事”。弗洛伊德对自传的性质持怀疑态度，自传传统上与杰出个人的线性演变人生故事联系在一起。他对写自己的自传不那么感兴趣，他建议自传作品中包含的关于婴儿记忆的心理研究要重要得多。相比之下，安德烈亚斯-萨洛姆在自传写作中使用了各种体裁，如精神分析理论文章、小说和自传。她给自己的童年记忆提供了一个多层次的表现，并将它们转变为一个应该由所有人共享的通用记忆。

This study examined a complementary or oppositional relationship between psy-choanalysis and autobiography/biography as literary genre by comparing the works of Sigmund Freud(1856-1939) and Lou Andreas-Salome(1861-1937), a writer and his coworker, in the Psychoanalytic Movement. In addition, taking account of Freudian theories of memory, the study investigated whether psychoanalysis enabled both writers to transform a "narrative of life." Freud was skeptical about the nature of an autobiography, which is traditionally associated with a linearly evolving life story of an outstanding individual. He was less interested in writing his own autobiography, sug-gesting that the psychological studies of infantile memories included in autobiograph-ical works are much more important. In contrast, Andreas-Salome used various genres in autobiographical writing, such as psychoanalytic theoretical essays, novels, and autobiographies. She gave her own childhood memories a multilayered representation and transfigured them into a universal memory that should be shared by all.