Mobility, Connectivity and Identity of the Population in the Space between Eastern Carpathians and Dnieper. Archaeological studies on the later pre-Roman Iron Age.

个人、群体和社会的流动现象并不局限于所谓的迁徙时期，而是自古以来就伴随着人类。人类的历史也是一部流动的历史。考古发现反映了巨大的动态和多样性，在区域不同的清晰度。这一方面是由于发现的可能性，但另一方面也是由于研究情况本身和可用的方法。在某种程度上，可以清楚地认识到跨文化影响；然而，往往很难区分这种“重叠”。迄今为止，在前罗马铁器时代晚期，对东喀尔巴阡山脉和第聂伯河地区之间的地区进行的考古研究传达了这样一幅图景。在这里可以追溯到几个考古群体，他们的时间、时代和社会地位没有像他们的起源和与其他群体的联系那样得到充分的研究。过去五、六十年的考古研究产生了丰富的考古资料。这为研究前罗马铁器时代晚期黑海西北部地区历史的各个方面奠定了基础，有助于描绘出这一大片地区发生的过程的总体图景，但也使人们有可能解决某些问题——年表、发现的起源、人口的生活方式——这些问题是这些人类社区发展的特征。与此同时，黑海西北部地区前罗马铁器时代晚期的精细年表、该地区的人口流动、跨文化影响、身份认同等一系列重要问题仍有待解决。我对这两个项目的研究让我意识到现有的研究需求，并促使我继续对上述问题进行研究，而这些问题一直被忽视。这将主要通过检查这些社区的“服装”来完成。“服装”是指一个人有意识地选择的外表元素。从这个意义上说，服装的概念还包括人身上穿的所有物品及其纺织成分，即包括珠宝，可能还包括武器。在外观的不同特征中，对集体符号系统中的个人参与和对该系统的个人实现的相互依赖变得明显，这很难区分，可以作为一种自我表现的策略一起阅读。

Mobility of individuals, groups and societies is a phenomenon that is not limited to the so-called migration period, but has accompanied mankind from time immemorial. The history of mankind is also a history of mobility. Archaeological finds reflect the great dynamics and diversity in regionally varying clarity. This is due on the one hand to the possibilities of discovery, but on the other hand also to the research situation itself and the available methods. In part, intercultural influences can be clearly recognized; however, it is often difficult to differentiate such "overlaps". Such a picture is conveyed by the archaeological research carried out so far for the region between the Eastern Carpathians and the Dnieper region in the later pre-Roman Iron Age. Here several archaeological groups can be traced, whose chronological, chorological and social position is not as sufficiently researched as their genesis and connectivity with other groups. The archaeological research of the last five to six decades has yielded a wealth of archaeological material. This forms the basis for the study of various aspects of the history of the northwestern Black Sea area in the later pre-Roman Iron Age and helps to draw a general picture of the processes that took place in this large area, but also makes it possible to work out certain problems - chronology, origin of finds, way of life of the population - that characterize the development of these human communities. At the same time, a number of important issues such as the fine chronology of the Late Pre-Roman Iron Age of the northwestern Black Sea area, human mobility in this area, cross-cultural influences, identity, etc. remain to be resolved. My research in the two projects has made me aware of the existing research desideratum and has prompted me to continue research on the above-mentioned questions, which have been rather ignored so far. This will be done primarily by examining the "clothing" of these communities. "Clothing" refers to the consciously chosen elements of a person's external appearance. In this sense, the concept of clothing also includes all objects that are worn on the body by a person together with the textile components, i.e. including jewelry and possibly weapons. In the different characteristics of the outer appearance, a mutual dependence on the personal participation in a collective sign system and on the individual realization of this system becomes apparent, which are difficult to distinguish and can be read together as a strategy of self-representation.