UC San Diego FIRST Program

加州大学圣地亚哥分校 FIRST 项目

• 批准号: 10494791
• 负责人: Deborah L Wingard
• 金额: $ 15.8万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2022-09-09 至 2027-08-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10494791
• 关键词: Address; Behavior; Biochemistry; Biological Sciences; California; Chemistry; Climate; Cognitive; Cognitive Science; Collaborations; Common Data Element; Competence; Data; Data Collection; Data Sources; Data Store; Databases; Development; Effectiveness; Elements; Engineering; Environment; Evaluation; Evidence based practice; Faculty; Focus Groups; Fostering; Funding; Goals; Grant; Health Sciences; Health Surveys; Human; Immersion; Individual; Institutes; Institution; Interview; Knowledge; Leadership; Longevity; Mentors; Mentorship; Modeling; Monitor; Morale; Oceanography; Outcome; Participant; Perception; Pharmacy facility; Population; Productivity; Program Development; Public Health Schools; Publications; Research; Schools; Secure; Self Efficacy; Self-Examination; Social Sciences; Structure; Surveys; System; Teacher Professional Development; Testing; Theoretical model; United States National Institutes of Health; Universities; Woman; base; career; career development; cohort; demographics; diversity and inclusion; evidence base; health equity; improved; innovation; medical schools; model design; organizational climate; physical science; programs; racial and ethnic; recruit; research and development; satisfaction; skills; social; success

Abstract Outcome data for underrepresented (UR) faculty development programs related to research productivity, retention, promotion, skill competencies, and program satisfaction exist but there is a lack of rigorous evaluation, especially assessment of mentoring effectiveness and impact on institutional climate and UR faculty morale. The goal of the Evaluation Core is to develop and implement an evaluation plan to assess the impact of the FIRST Cohort program on our institution and to assist the CEC in evaluating the overall combined FIRST Cohort program. The analysis plan will test the overarching hypothesis that a cohort and cluster design model of faculty hiring, sponsorship, continual mentoring, and professional development, embedded within an institution implementing evidence-based practices to create academic cultures of inclusive excellence, will achieve significant improvements in metrics of institutional culture and scientific discovery. Four specific aims are proposed. Aim 1. Theoretical Model. To develop a plan of analysis based on theoretical models and conceptual framework in collaboration with CEC and other FIRST Cohort Awardees. Aim 2. Common Data Elements. To collaborate with the CEC and other FIRST Cohort Awardees to develop common data elements (including program activities, participant outcomes, and institutional outcomes) to evaluate the success of the program. Aim 3. Database. To adapt current Office of Faculty Affairs database to track program activities, collect participant data, and collect institutional data. Aim 4. Evaluation. To share common data elements with the FIRST CEC as requested, to collaborate on evaluation of FIRST Cohort impact across all awardees, and to assess local institutional impact of FIRST Cohort activities. These aims will be accomplished through adapting the current UCSD Office of Faculty Affairs database to include tracking FIRST program activities, FIRST participant data, and institutional data. Participant data will include evaluations of self-efficacy, skills and behaviors, supplemented by interviews/focus groups. Institutional data will be obtained through institutional demographic databases, two climate surveys of health sciences and campus-based faculty, as well as interviews/focus groups. Participant impact will be analyzed by examining recruitment and retention, career success (grants, publications, leadership, promotion) and improved skills and knowledge (self-efficacy and behaviors). Institutional impact of the FIRST program will be analyzed by examining changes in demographics and climate, including morale and environment. Interviews and focus groups will explore components of the FIRST program that contribute to improved climate and culture. Together, these analyses efforts will demonstrate that using evidence-based strategies to enhance UR faculty academic advancement, research and career development and integration, and the implementation of system- wide structured faculty development programs, will lead to inclusive excellence and improve the academic climate.

摘要 与研究效率相关的代表不足(UR)教师发展计划的结果数据， 存在留住、晋升、技能能力和计划满意度，但缺乏严谨 评估，特别是对辅导效果和对机构氛围和UR的影响的评估 教职员工士气。评价核心的目标是制定和实施评价计划，以评估 第一个队列计划对我们机构的影响，并协助CEC评估总体 合并的第一队列计划。分析计划将测试最重要的假设，即队列和 教师聘用、赞助、持续指导、专业发展的集群设计模式， 嵌入到实施循证实践的机构中，以创建包容性的学术文化 卓越，将在机构文化和科学发现的衡量标准方面取得重大改进。 提出了四个具体目标。目的1.理论模型。制定基于以下内容的分析计划 与CEC和其他第一批获奖者合作的理论模型和概念框架。 目标2.公共数据元素。与CEC和其他第一批获奖者合作开发 公共数据元素(包括计划活动、参与者结果和机构结果) 评估该计划的成功程度。目标3.数据库。调整现有的教务处数据库以适应 跟踪计划活动、收集参与者数据和收集机构数据。目的4.评价。分享 应要求与第一个CEC进行公共数据元素协作，以评估第一个队列 对所有获奖者的影响，并评估First Cohort活动对当地机构的影响。这些目标将 通过调整加州大学学院目前的教务处数据库，使其包括跟踪 首批计划活动、首批参与者数据和机构数据。参与者数据将包括 自我效能、技能和行为的评估，辅以访谈/焦点小组。机构数据 将通过机构人口数据库、两项健康科学气候调查和 以校园为基础的教职员工以及面试/焦点小组。参与者的影响将通过审查进行分析 招聘和留用、职业成功(赠款、出版物、领导力、晋升)以及提高技能和 知识(自我效能和行为)。第一个计划的制度影响将由以下人员分析 研究人口和气候的变化，包括士气和环境。采访和焦点 小组将探索第一个项目中有助于改善气候和文化的组成部分。 总之，这些分析工作将证明，使用基于证据的策略来加强UR教师 学术进步、研究和职业发展和融合，并实施制度-- 广泛的结构化教师发展计划，将导致包容性的卓越和提高学术 气候。