UC San Diego FIRST Program

加州大学圣地亚哥分校 FIRST 项目

• 批准号: 10494791
• 负责人: Deborah L Wingard
• 金额: $ 15.8万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2022-09-09 至 2027-08-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10494791
• 关键词: Address; Behavior; Biochemistry; Biological Sciences; California; Chemistry; Climate; Cognitive; Cognitive Science; Collaborations; Common Data Element; Competence; Data; Data Collection; Data Sources; Data Store; Databases; Development; Effectiveness; Elements; Engineering; Environment; Evaluation; Evidence based practice; Faculty; Focus Groups; Fostering; Funding; Goals; Grant; Health Sciences; Health Surveys; Human; Immersion; Individual; Institutes; Institution; Interview; Knowledge; Leadership; Longevity; Mentors; Mentorship; Modeling; Monitor; Morale; Oceanography; Outcome; Participant; Perception; Pharmacy facility; Population; Productivity; Program Development; Public Health Schools; Publications; Research; Schools; Secure; Self Efficacy; Self-Examination; Social Sciences; Structure; Surveys; System; Teacher Professional Development; Testing; Theoretical model; United States National Institutes of Health; Universities; Woman; base; career; career development; cohort; demographics; diversity and inclusion; evidence base; health equity; improved; innovation; medical schools; model design; organizational climate; physical science; programs; racial and ethnic; recruit; research and development; satisfaction; skills; social; success

Abstract Outcome data for underrepresented (UR) faculty development programs related to research productivity, retention, promotion, skill competencies, and program satisfaction exist but there is a lack of rigorous evaluation, especially assessment of mentoring effectiveness and impact on institutional climate and UR faculty morale. The goal of the Evaluation Core is to develop and implement an evaluation plan to assess the impact of the FIRST Cohort program on our institution and to assist the CEC in evaluating the overall combined FIRST Cohort program. The analysis plan will test the overarching hypothesis that a cohort and cluster design model of faculty hiring, sponsorship, continual mentoring, and professional development, embedded within an institution implementing evidence-based practices to create academic cultures of inclusive excellence, will achieve significant improvements in metrics of institutional culture and scientific discovery. Four specific aims are proposed. Aim 1. Theoretical Model. To develop a plan of analysis based on theoretical models and conceptual framework in collaboration with CEC and other FIRST Cohort Awardees. Aim 2. Common Data Elements. To collaborate with the CEC and other FIRST Cohort Awardees to develop common data elements (including program activities, participant outcomes, and institutional outcomes) to evaluate the success of the program. Aim 3. Database. To adapt current Office of Faculty Affairs database to track program activities, collect participant data, and collect institutional data. Aim 4. Evaluation. To share common data elements with the FIRST CEC as requested, to collaborate on evaluation of FIRST Cohort impact across all awardees, and to assess local institutional impact of FIRST Cohort activities. These aims will be accomplished through adapting the current UCSD Office of Faculty Affairs database to include tracking FIRST program activities, FIRST participant data, and institutional data. Participant data will include evaluations of self-efficacy, skills and behaviors, supplemented by interviews/focus groups. Institutional data will be obtained through institutional demographic databases, two climate surveys of health sciences and campus-based faculty, as well as interviews/focus groups. Participant impact will be analyzed by examining recruitment and retention, career success (grants, publications, leadership, promotion) and improved skills and knowledge (self-efficacy and behaviors). Institutional impact of the FIRST program will be analyzed by examining changes in demographics and climate, including morale and environment. Interviews and focus groups will explore components of the FIRST program that contribute to improved climate and culture. Together, these analyses efforts will demonstrate that using evidence-based strategies to enhance UR faculty academic advancement, research and career development and integration, and the implementation of system- wide structured faculty development programs, will lead to inclusive excellence and improve the academic climate.

摘要 与研究生产力相关的代表性不足（UR）教师发展计划的结果数据， 保留，晋升，技能能力和计划满意度存在，但缺乏严格的 评价，特别是评估辅导的有效性和对机构气候和工发组织代表的影响 教师士气。评价核心的目标是制定和实施一项评价计划， FIRST队列计划对我们机构的影响，并协助CEC评估整体 联合FIRST队列计划。分析计划将检验总体假设，即一个队列和 教师招聘，赞助，持续指导和专业发展的集群设计模式， 嵌入在一个机构实施以证据为基础的做法，以创造学术文化的包容性 卓越，将实现机构文化和科学发现的指标的显着改善。 提出了四个具体目标。目标1.理论模型。制定分析计划， 与CEC和其他FIRST队列获奖者合作的理论模型和概念框架。 目标2.通用数据元素。与CEC和其他FIRST队列获奖者合作， 通用数据元素（包括项目活动、参与者成果和机构成果）， 评估该计划的成功。目标3.数据库调整现有的学院事务办公室数据库， 跟踪计划活动，收集参与者数据，并收集机构数据。目标4。评价分享 根据要求与FIRST CEC提供通用数据元素，以合作评估FIRST队列 对所有获奖者的影响，并评估FIRST队列活动对当地机构的影响。这些目标将 通过调整目前的UCSD教师事务办公室数据库，包括跟踪 FIRST计划活动、FIRST参与者数据和机构数据。参与者数据将包括 自我效能、技能和行为的评估，辅以访谈/焦点小组。机构数据 将通过机构人口数据库、两项健康科学气候调查和 以校园为基础的教师，以及面试/焦点小组。参与者的影响将通过检查 征聘和留用、职业成功（赠款、出版物、领导才能、晋升）和提高技能， 知识（自我效能和行为）。FIRST计划的机构影响将通过以下方式进行分析： 研究人口和气候的变化，包括士气和环境。访谈和焦点 小组将探索FIRST计划中有助于改善气候和文化的组成部分。 总之，这些分析工作将表明，使用循证策略，以提高UR教师 学术进步，研究和职业发展和整合，以及系统的实施- 广泛的结构化教师发展计划，将导致包容性的卓越和提高学术 气候