The Role of Technology in Evaluating Cultural Value

技术在评估文化价值中的作用

• 批准号: AH/L006170/1
• 负责人: Eric Jensen
• 金额: $ 4.04万
• 依托单位: University of Warwick
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2014
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2014 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FL006170%2F1
• 关键词: Role; Technology; Evaluating; Cultural; Value

Methods of evaluating cultural impact still need substantial development to support robust, long-term empirical research on cultural value. Meanwhile, technological innovations have raised new possibilities for evaluating cultural value that promise to increase efficiency, reach and validity beyond what is possible with conventional methods. This proposed project considers several technology-enhanced methods for evaluating cultural value, providing descriptions and critical assessments to elucidate their strengths and weakness. This project focuses on evaluation methodology per se, with the aim of supporting future empirical evaluation and research on cultural value. The project begins with existing research and methodological literature on this topic. This project will review current literature on the use of technologies to evaluate the development of cultural value through events, institutions and digital platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, individual webpages, etc. The project team will identify the strengths and weakness of different technologies and technology-enhanced evaluation approaches to suggest an appropriate framework for making best use of digital technologies in cultural value evaluation. The results of this critical literature review will be able to broadly be applied to a framework that can advance the way in which the value of cultural engagement is evaluated and employed.MethodsThe methodology employed for this project will integrate a range of research approaches, embracing the partners' knowledge of arts/culture engagement impact evaluation, software design, production and implementation, mixed methods data analysis, visualisation of digital programmes and the requirements for integrating these new modes with more traditional cultural impact analysis. At its core, the project is focused on how we can capitalise on digital technologies to build a robust, evidence-based evaluation framework, while at the same time maintaining a critical perspective with respect to the limits of the technologies' contribution to evaluating cultural value. Critical Review This phase of the research will involve a review of the evidence identified in the scoping review, using transparent, clear protocols for critical appraisal of the studies, predefined relevance criteria, and any extraction and analysis of data, and thus fulfilling criteria of Campbell Collaboration guidelines. Summaries of evidence under appropriate headings will note where evidence gaps or weaknesses occur. Critical Review ProcessThe critical review process will involve the following key stages:1. Literature identified 2. Decision on relevance3. Extract/obtain full papers 4. Summarise included papers' methods and applications of methods 5. Critically assess methods in existing literature6. Identify additional technology-linked methodological options from beyond the existing literature on evaluating culture value7. Critically assess additional methodological options8. Prepare table(s) summarising methodological options, strengths and weaknesses and write up report

评估文化影响的方法仍需要大量发展，以支持对文化价值进行稳健、长期的实证研究。与此同时，技术创新为评估文化价值带来了新的可能性，有望提高效率、影响范围和有效性，超越传统方法。该拟议项目考虑了几种评估文化价值的技术增强方法，提供描述和批判性评估以阐明其优点和缺点。本项目关注评估方法本身，旨在支持未来文化价值的实证评估和研究。该项目从有关该主题的现有研究和方法文献开始。该项目将回顾当前有关利用技术通过活动、机构和数字平台（如 Twitter、Facebook、个人网页等）评估文化价值发展的文献。项目团队将识别不同技术和技术增强评估方法的优缺点，提出一个适当的框架，以便在文化价值评估中充分利用数字技术。这项批判性文献综述的结果将能够广泛应用于一个框架，该框架可以推进文化参与价值的评估和利用方式。方法该项目采用的方法将整合一系列研究方法，包括合作伙伴在艺术/文化参与影响评估、软件设计、生产和实施、混合方法数据分析、数字程序可视化以及将这些新模式与更传统文化影响相结合的要求方面的知识。 分析。该项目的核心重点是我们如何利用数字技术建立一个强大的、基于证据的评估框架，同时对技术对评估文化价值的贡献的局限性保持批判性的视角。批判性审查 这一阶段的研究将涉及对范围界定审查中确定的证据进行审查，使用透明、清晰的方案对研究进行批判性评估、预定义的相关性标准以及数据的提取和分析，从而满足坎贝尔合作指南的标准。适当标题下的证据摘要将指出出现证据差距或弱点的地方。严格审查过程严格审查过程将涉及以下关键阶段： 1．确定的文献 2. 相关性决定 3.摘录/获取全文 4. 总结收录论文的方法和方法的应用 5. 批判性地评估现有文献中的方法 6.从评估文化价值的现有文献中找出其他与技术相关的方法选项7。严格评估其他方法选项8。准备表格总结方法选项、优点和缺点并撰写报告