Positing or Predicating? Existence after Kant

定位还是预测？

• 批准号: AH/Y007506/1
• 负责人: Mark Textor
• 金额: $ 44.87万
• 依托单位: King's College London
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2024
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2024 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FY007506%2F1
• 关键词: Positing; Predicating; Existence; after; Kant

Many central philosophical issues concern the existence of things of certain kinds. In other words, we try to get clear whether numbers exist or not, whether properties exist or not and so one. At the same time existence is a puzzling property: it seems not to qualify or determine things further like, for instance, the property of being red does. Given, on the one hand, its fundamental importance and, on the other, its puzzling character it is unsurprising that philosophers have theorized about existence since antiquity. Kant's take on existence is generally seen as a paradigm change in the history of thinking about this concept. The discussion of Kant's innovation focused so far almost exclusively on Frege, Russell, Quine and their followers and ignored 19th century contributions that worked out Kant's thought in radically different and fruitful ways. Our project intends to change this situation. We will explore the most important 19th century constructive responses to Kant's view of existence and thereby provide a better understanding of the Kantian paradigm change as well as gain new insights into existence. We will argue that the 19th century engagement with Kant adds something new to contemporary work on existence and can be compared and contrasted in fruitful ways with it.

许多中心的哲学问题都涉及到某些种类的事物的存在。换句话说，我们试图弄清楚数是否存在，属性是否存在等等。同时，存在是一个令人困惑的属性：它似乎不像红色的属性那样进一步限定或决定事物。一方面，考虑到它的根本重要性，另一方面，考虑到它令人困惑的特性，哲学家们自古以来就对存在进行理论化就不足为奇了。康德对存在的看法通常被视为对这一概念的思考史上的范式转变。到目前为止，对康德创新的讨论几乎完全集中在弗雷格、罗素、奎因和他们的追随者身上，而忽略了19世纪以完全不同和富有成效的方式阐述康德思想的贡献。我们的项目旨在改变这种状况。我们将探讨世纪对康德存在观最重要的建设性回应，从而更好地理解康德的范式转变，并获得对存在的新见解。我们将论证，世纪与康德的接触为当代关于存在的工作增添了一些新的东西，并且可以以富有成效的方式与之进行比较和对比。