Aristoteles Pezographos: The Writing Styles of Aristotle and their Contribution to the Evolution of Ancient Greek Prose

亚里士多德，一个至高无上的知识分子，改变了哲学和其他学科，如自然科学和文学研究。然而，他自己的风格和语言却被忽视了，尽管他在时间上介于古典的阿提卡散文和希腊化的大多数散文类型之间，公元前4世纪晚期希腊世界的发展。这个项目将探讨他在文学史和语言史上的地位，特别是与荷马、戏剧、修辞和柏拉图的关系，为他被排除在外的散文写作叙事谱写新的篇章。它使用包括“传统”文学批评、叙事学、文体测量软件和历史语言学在内的方法，对他的插图、典故、句法、修辞、句子类型、段落和论文结构、语言和词汇进行了前所未有的欣赏，审查了他所有的论文，这些论文在很大程度上被认为是真实的，加上有争议的《雅典政治》（athenationon Politeia）。产出提供了互补的视角：1)插图和典故；2)句子类型、数字、时态及其与口语交际的关系；3)词汇、语言及其在希腊语演变中的地位；4)古代哲学评论如何回应他的风格；5)专门研究单篇论文或风格和哲学主题（国际会议）；6)注明参考书目（网站）。通过提供亚里士多德作为作家被忽视的地位的第一个评估，结果将改变亚里士多德的研究；这将加强未来的研究，特别是了解亚里士多德独特的文学声音如何与他的科学方法相互作用，使他的思想更加清晰，生动和难忘。这些结果也将为未来的研究提供信息，这些研究怀疑亚里士多德的作者身份，以及他的继承人和评论家所回应的风格的确切性质。

Aristotle, a supreme intellectual figure, transformed both philosophy and other disciplines such as natural science and literary studies. Yet his own style and language have been overlooked, although he stands chronologically between classical Attic prose and the Hellenistic koine of most prose genres after the late 4th-century BCE growth of the Greek world. This project addresses his place in the history of literature and language, especially in relation to Homer, drama, rhetoric and Plato, writing a new chapter in the narrative of prose-writing that has excluded him. It scrutinises all his treatises largely regarded as authentic, plus the contested Athenaion Politeia, using methodologies including 'traditional' literary criticism, narratology, stylometric software and historical linguistics, allowing an unprecedented appreciation, in relationship to scientific method and communicative medium, of his illustrations, allusions, syntax, figures of speech, sentence type, paragraph and treatise structure, language and vocabulary. The outputs offer complementary perspectives: 1) illustrations and allusions; 2) sentence types, figures, tenses and relationship with oral communication; 3) vocabulary, language and place in the evolution of Greek; 4) how ancient philosophical commentaries responded to his style; 5) dedicated studies of single treatises or stylistic and philosophical topics (International Conference); 6) annotated bibliography (Website). The results will transform Aristotelian studies by providing the first assessment of Aristotle's neglected status as writer; this will enhance future studies, especially understanding how Aristotle's distinctive literary voice interacts with his scientific method and makes his ideas more lucid, vivid and memorable. The results will also inform future investigations of the Peripatetic treatises for which Aristotelian authorship has been suspected and the precise nature of the style to which his heirs and commentators responded.