Individual and contextual deprivation: Association with cancer outcomes and implications for cancer policy

个人和背景剥夺：与癌症结果的关联以及对癌症政策的影响

• 批准号: ES/S001808/1
• 负责人: Aurelien Belot
• 金额: $ 20.46万
• 依托单位: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2019 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FS001808%2F1
• 关键词: Individual; contextual; deprivation; Association; cancer

In the UK, people who reside within more income-deprived areas live a shorter period of time after a diagnosis of cancer compared to people living in less income-deprived areas. At least part of these inequalities in cancer survival are due to inequalities in cancer care, even considering differential patient and tumour factors such as stage at diagnosis. The specific mechanisms by which area-based deprivation levels lead to poorer individual health outcomes within the context of a universal healthcare system, free at the point of use, are not well understood. These analyses will enable, for the first time, the examination of how an individual patient's socio-economic status is associated with poorer cancer survival in England, and will demonstrate how these associations might be modified by the level of deprivation in the small area within which the patient resides.Our aim is to perform an in-depth study of the association between the individual patient's deprivation and cancer survival, considering in particular how this is influenced by their socio-economic context, whether it varies over time since diagnosis and whether it has changed over calendar time. We will focus on three indicators of deprivation: income, education and occupation. We will first examine the correlation between individual and area deprivation, by each of these indicators, and then secondly describe the association between individual deprivation and survival. Third, we will assess whether the association between individual deprivation and patients' survival is modified by area deprivation; that is, whether equally deprived individuals in different areas fare better, or worse, according to the socio-economic context of the area within which they live. Finally we will gain the insights of patients, carers, and healthcare professionals on these data, and communicate these to cancer policy makers.We will use data from the ONS Longitudinal Study, which contains individual deprivation information on 1% of individuals in England present at each national census since 1971. The ONS-LS is linked to Cancer Registry data so that information on all diagnoses of invasive cancer amongst cohort members can be examined. These data will be further linked to the Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) defined at the Lower Super Output Area (LSOA, mean population 1,500) to obtain area-based measures of deprivation. We will fit regression models for the excess mortality hazard (EMH) in order to examine how cancer survival varies with individual deprivation status. The EMH represents the mortality hazard that is observed among cancer patients, taking into account each patient's expected mortality. We will construct life tables stratified by individual deprivation, using the ONS-LS mortality and population data, in order to account as accurately as possible for this background mortality. We will assess whether these associations are modified according to the ecological level of deprivation through the use of interaction terms. We will examine time-dependent associations between individual deprivation and the EMH using flexible functions, and will account for the correlation between observations coming from the same small area through a shared random-effect (defined at LSOA level).The results will allow us to determine the degree of correspondence between individual and area deprivation for cancer patients; to assess how individual deprivation (income, education or occupation) is associated with cancer-specific mortality; and to quantify if and how these associations are modified according to area deprivation, as well as how these associations vary by the time since diagnosis. During the final phases of the project we will seek the insights of patients, carers and healthcare professionals upon our findings. These will then be directly shared with policy makers in a half-day workshop, so that future policies aimed at reducing socio-economic inequalities are more targeted.

在英国，与生活在收入较低地区的人相比，生活在收入较低地区的人在诊断出癌症后的时间更短。癌症存活率的不平等至少部分是由于癌症护理的不平等，即使考虑到不同的患者和肿瘤因素，如诊断阶段。在使用时免费的全民保健系统中，基于地区的贫困程度导致个人健康结果较差的具体机制尚不清楚。这些分析将使，第一次，在英格兰，个体患者的社会经济地位如何与癌症生存率较差相关的检查，并将展示这些关联如何被患者居住的小区域内的剥夺水平所改变。我们的目的是对个体患者的剥夺与癌症生存率之间的关联进行深入研究，特别是考虑到这一点如何受到其社会经济背景的影响，自诊断以来是否随着时间的推移而变化，以及是否随着日历时间的推移而变化。我们将侧重于贫困的三个指标：收入、教育和职业。我们将首先检查个人和地区的剥夺之间的相关性，通过这些指标，然后描述个人剥夺和生存之间的关联。第三，我们将评估个人剥夺和患者生存之间的关联是否被区域剥夺所改变;也就是说，根据他们生活的地区的社会经济背景，不同地区的同样被剥夺的个人的情况是否更好或更差。最后，我们将获得患者，护理人员和医疗保健专业人员对这些数据的见解，并将其传达给癌症政策制定者。我们将使用ONS纵向研究的数据，其中包含自1971年以来每次全国人口普查中英格兰1%的个人的个人剥夺信息。ONS-LS与癌症登记数据相关联，以便可以检查队列成员中所有浸润性癌症诊断的信息。这些数据将进一步与下超级产出区（LSOA，平均人口1 500人）确定的多重贫困指数联系起来，以获得基于地区的贫困衡量标准。我们将拟合超额死亡率风险（EMH）的回归模型，以研究癌症生存率如何随个体剥夺状态而变化。EMH代表了在癌症患者中观察到的死亡率风险，考虑到每个患者的预期死亡率。我们将使用ONS-LS的死亡率和人口数据，构建按个人贫困分层的生命表，以便尽可能准确地说明这一背景死亡率。我们将评估这些协会是否修改根据生态水平的剥夺，通过使用的相互作用条款。我们将使用灵活的函数来检验个体剥夺与有效市场假说之间的时间依赖性关联，并将通过共享随机效应来解释来自同一小区域的观测之间的相关性（定义在LSOA水平）。结果将使我们能够确定癌症患者的个体和区域剥夺之间的对应程度;评估个人贫困（收入、教育或职业）与癌症死亡率之间的关系;量化这些关联是否以及如何根据地区贫困而改变，以及这些关联如何随着诊断时间的推移而变化。在项目的最后阶段，我们将寻求患者，护理人员和医疗保健专业人员对我们的研究结果的见解。然后将在为期半天的讲习班上与决策者直接分享这些成果，以便今后旨在减少社会经济不平等的政策更有针对性。

项目成果

Are deprivation-specific cancer survival patterns similar according to individual-based and area-based measures? A cohort study of patients diagnosed with five malignancies in England and Wales, 2008-2016.

• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058411
• 发表时间: 2022-06-10
• 期刊: BMJ OPEN
• 影响因子: 2.9
• 作者: Woods, Laura M.;Belot, Aurelien;Atherton, Iain M.;Ellis-Brookes, Lucy;Baker, Matthew;Ingleby, Fiona C.
• 通讯作者: Ingleby, Fiona C.

An investigation of cancer survival inequalities associated with individual-level socio-economic status, area-level deprivation, and contextual effects, in a cancer patient cohort in England and Wales.

• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-12525-1
• 发表时间: 2022-01-13
• 期刊: BMC public health
• 影响因子: 4.5
• 作者: Ingleby FC;Woods LM;Atherton IM;Baker M;Elliss-Brookes L;Belot A
• 通讯作者: Belot A

Additional file 1 of An investigation of cancer survival inequalities associated with individual-level socio-economic status, area-level deprivation, and contextual effects, in a cancer patient cohort in England and Wales

英格兰和威尔士癌症患者队列中与个人社会经济地位、地区水平剥夺和背景影响相关的癌症生存不平等的调查的附加文件 1

• DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.18393284
• 发表时间: 2022
• 作者: Ingleby F

Describing socio-economic variation in life expectancy according to an individual's education, occupation and wage in England and Wales: An analysis of the ONS Longitudinal Study.

• DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100815
• 发表时间: 2021-06
• 期刊: SSM - population health
• 作者: Ingleby FC;Woods LM;Atherton IM;Baker M;Elliss-Brookes L;Belot A
• 通讯作者: Belot A

Assessment of the concordance between individual-level and area-level measures of socio-economic deprivation in a cancer patient cohort in England and Wales.

• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041714
• 发表时间: 2020-11-26
• 期刊: BMJ open
• 影响因子: 2.9
• 作者: Ingleby FC;Belot A;Atherton I;Baker M;Elliss-Brookes L;Woods LM
• 通讯作者: Woods LM