ORA (Round 5): How are varying care systems associated with inequalities in care and wellbeing in later life?

ORA（第 5 轮）：不同的护理系统与晚年护理和福祉的不平等有何关联？

• 批准号: ES/S01523X/1
• 负责人: Karen Glaser
• 金额: $ 61.99万
• 依托单位: King's College London
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Research Grant
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2019 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FS01523X%2F1
• 关键词: ORA; Round; How; varying; care

Ageing societies and recent reforms to long-term care (LTC) in many European countries are likely to make informal care by kin and nonkin increasingly critical for fulfilling the care needs of older people. To date, it is unknown whether informal care falls disproportionately on disadvantaged populations, and the consequences for the wellbeing of care recipients and their carers are poorly understood. The proposed research examines if and how LTC reforms exacerbate existing social disparities in care and in caregiver and care recipient wellbeing. To this end, this project compares the socioeconomic status (SES) gradient in formal and informal care and its impact on wellbeing across Europe and Japan. This objective is studied a) in context (across nations and regions with different care systems and within countries over time) using an updated set of indicators of LTC policies; b) from the perspectives of both the care recipient and the informal caregiver; c) through a focus on quality of care; and d) by carrying out policy evaluation natural experiments. A better understanding of the consequences of different care policies for inequalities in care, and caregiver and care recipient wellbeing, will inform debate on the potential impact of future policy decisions. The project team combines expertise on LTC arrangements, informal care, and cross-national analyses from demographic, sociological, gerontological, epidemiological and health economic perspectives.

老龄化社会和许多欧洲国家最近对长期护理(LTC)进行的改革，可能会使亲属和非亲属的非正式护理对满足老年人的护理需求越来越重要。到目前为止，尚不清楚非正式护理是否不成比例地落在弱势群体身上，对护理接受者及其照顾者的福祉的后果也知之甚少。这项拟议的研究调查了长期护理改革是否以及如何加剧了现有的护理以及照顾者和接受者福祉方面的社会差距。为此，该项目比较了正式和非正式护理的社会经济地位(SES)梯度及其对欧洲和日本的福祉的影响。这一目标是在以下背景下进行研究的：a)使用一套更新的长期护理政策指标(在不同护理制度的国家和地区以及国家内)；b)从护理接受者和非正式护理者的角度；c)侧重于护理质量；d)开展政策评估自然实验。更好地理解不同护理政策对护理不平等以及照顾者和接受者福祉的影响，将有助于就未来政策决定的潜在影响进行辩论。该项目小组结合了长期护理安排、非正式护理和从人口统计学、社会学、老年学、流行病学和卫生经济学角度进行的跨国分析方面的专业知识。

项目成果

Partner Care Arrangements and Well-Being in Mid- and Later Life: The Role of Gender Across Care Contexts.

• DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbab209
• 发表时间: 2022-02-03
• 期刊: The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences
• 作者: Floridi G;Quashie NT;Glaser K;Brandt M
• 通讯作者: Brandt M

Should I Care or Should I Work? The Impact of Work on Informal Care

我应该关心还是应该工作？

• DOI: 10.1002/pam.22457
• 发表时间: 2022
• 期刊: Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
• 影响因子: 3.8
• 作者: Carrino L

Do Standard Classifications Still Represent European Welfare Typologies? Novel Evidence from Studies on Health and Social Care

标准分类仍然代表欧洲福利类型吗？

• DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3820358
• 发表时间: 2021
• 期刊: SSRN Electronic Journal
• 作者: Bertin G

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe.

• DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa139
• 发表时间: 2021-01-01
• 期刊: The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences
• 作者: Floridi G;Carrino L;Glaser K
• 通讯作者: Glaser K

Indicators of familialism and defamilialization in long-term care: A theoretical overview and introduction of macro-level indicators

长期护理中的家庭主义和陌生化指标：理论概述和宏观指标介绍

• DOI: 10.1177/09589287221115669
• 发表时间: 2022
• 期刊: Journal of European Social Policy
• 影响因子: 3
• 作者: Verbakel E