Screen Lives: What the experiences of documentary contributors tell us about the media

银幕生活：纪录片撰稿人的经历告诉我们关于媒体的什么

• 批准号: ES/Y007808/1
• 负责人: Emily Coleman
• 金额: $ 16.02万
• 依托单位: King's College London
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Fellowship
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2023 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FY007808%2F1
• 关键词: Screen; Lives; What; experiences; documentary

The overall aim of this fellowship is to have a positive impact upon the wellbeing of the ordinary people who take part in media productions and the ways they are represented, by influencing working practices, policy, and public debates. This will be achieved through a programme of activities designed to make the findings of my research accessible to influential audiences - including academics, industry bodies, and the general public.From the public discourse, we might surmise that contributing to the media is an ambivalent proposition at best. Contributors are derided as fame-hungry, greedy and narcissistic on the one hand, and naive victims of the other (Winston, 1988; De Benedictis et al., 2017). Yet despite the increasing centrality of media participation in everyday life, surprisingly little sociological interest has been paid to the actual people involved. Their dual status, as both insiders and outsiders, both subject and object, affords them a unique perspective; but furthermore, means that their experiences can reveal a great deal about the politics of the media. A key finding of my research is that the wellbeing of media contributors is inextricably tied to the production environment, which has been fundamentally reshaped by the deregulation of the industry. Until the 1980s, a comfortable duopoly of the BBC and ITV broadcast to a captive audience, reaching tens of millions of viewers every night. Since then, the launch of the independent production sector, multi-channel television, the Internet, TV on demand, and streaming services are among a multitude of developments which have led to the creation of a hyper-competitive media environment and a fragmented audience (Hesmondhalgh, 2018). Media research to date has tended to focus upon theexperiences of workers in the creative industries, but the consequences of political-economic reorganisation ripple out far beyond the paid workforce, to everyone who participates. The impact of structural changes upon ordinary people has scarcely figured within policy debates and the public discourse, which typically revolve around vulnerable participants and the effects of social media trolling upon their mental health. The industry has made considerable investments in psychological screening and aftercare, but my findings suggest these measures are unlikely to address many of the fundamental causes of contributor distress (Coleman, 2023). The purpose of this fellowship is to contribute to a growing debate about duty of care and how it is conceptualised within the creative industries, encouraging policy-makers to look beyond quick-fix solutions and make the workplace a fairer and safer environment. As a former TV producer, I will use my professional contacts to publicise my research amongst the industry, circulating my findings to executives at broadcasters and production companies, in order to reshape the conversation surrounding duty of care, and make an impact upon future policy directions. To develop the field of research within academia, I plan to turn my thesis into a monograph, making my findings accessible to future researchers, and raising the profile of these important issues. As the first book-length publication to examine the media industries from the perspective of its subjects, this monograph has the potential to make a significant impact upon the wider scholarship. These activities will be supported through regular mentoring sessions with Dr Christina Scharff, who is a leading international scholar in the field of creative work and the cultural industries, with sharedinterests in subjectivity, social justice, and qualitative research. In these sessions, I will be able to discuss my work in progress and receive feedback on my manuscript. The fellowship will give me the opportunity to maximise the value of my research, and develop the core skills I need to support my transition into academia.

该奖学金的总体目标是通过影响工作实践，政策和公共辩论，对参与媒体制作的普通人的福祉及其代表方式产生积极影响。这将通过一系列活动来实现，这些活动旨在使我的研究成果能够被有影响力的受众所了解，包括学术界、行业机构和公众。从公众话语中，我们可能会发现，向媒体投稿充其量是一个矛盾的命题。贡献者一方面被嘲笑为渴望成名，贪婪和自恋，另一方面是天真的受害者（Winston，1988; De Benedictis等人，2017年）。然而，尽管媒体在日常生活中的参与越来越重要，但令人惊讶的是，社会学对实际参与者的兴趣却很少。他们既是局内人又是局外人，既是主体又是客体的双重身份，使他们有了独特的视角;但更重要的是，他们的经历可以揭示许多关于媒体政治的信息。我的研究的一个关键发现是，媒体贡献者的福祉与生产环境密不可分，而生产环境已被行业的放松管制从根本上重塑。直到20世纪80年代，英国广播公司和独立电视台的舒适双寡头垄断向俘虏观众广播，每晚达到数千万观众。从那时起，独立制作部门，多频道电视，互联网，电视点播和流媒体服务的推出是众多发展中的一部分，这些发展导致了竞争激烈的媒体环境和分散的观众（Hesmondhalgh，2018）。到目前为止，媒体研究往往集中在创意产业工人的经历上，但政治经济重组的后果涟漪超出了有偿劳动力的范围，波及到了每一个参与者。结构性变化对普通人的影响在政策辩论和公共话语中几乎没有出现，这些辩论和公共话语通常围绕着弱势参与者以及社交媒体对其心理健康的影响。该行业在心理筛查和善后方面投入了大量资金，但我的研究结果表明，这些措施不太可能解决贡献者痛苦的许多根本原因（科尔曼，2023）。该奖学金的目的是促进日益增长的关于注意义务的辩论，以及如何在创意产业中将其概念化，鼓励政策制定者超越快速解决方案，使工作场所成为一个更公平，更安全的环境。作为一名前电视制片人，我将利用我的专业关系在行业中宣传我的研究，将我的研究结果分发给广播公司和制作公司的高管，以重塑围绕注意义务的对话，并对未来的政策方向产生影响。为了在学术界发展研究领域，我计划将我的论文变成一本专著，使我的研究结果能够为未来的研究人员所用，并提高这些重要问题的知名度。作为第一本从学科角度研究媒体行业的书籍，这本专著有可能对更广泛的学术界产生重大影响。这些活动将通过与Christina Scharff博士的定期指导会议得到支持，Christina Scharff博士是创意工作和文化产业领域的领先国际学者，在主观性，社会正义和定性研究方面有着共同的兴趣。在这些会议上，我将能够讨论我正在进行的工作，并收到对我的手稿的反馈。奖学金将给我机会，以最大限度地提高我的研究价值，并发展我需要支持我的过渡到学术界的核心技能。