课题基金 / 基金详情

Comparison of Cognitive Treatments for Headache Pain

Comparison of Cognitive Treatments for Headache Pain
头痛认知治疗的比较
批准号:
6316427
负责人:
BEVERLY E THORN
金额:
$14.3万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2001
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2001-09-20 至 2005-09-19

项目摘要

项目成果

BEVERLY E THORN的其他基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
APPLICANT?S DESCRIPTION: Cognitive-behavioral interventions are an effective component of multidisciplinary treatment for patients with pain problems. The critical components for treatment success are not known, nor is it understood why CBT works better for some patients than for others. Very few studies have evaluated the utility of specific components of CBT for pain, and the comparison of cognitive components of CBT is particularly lacking. The first aim of this study is to conduct a randomized control comparison of two cognitive-behavioral interventions for headache pain to a delayed treatment control group. The two cognitive interventions employed will be treatment focused on the reduction of pain-specific dysfunctional cognitions and treatment focused on teaching cognitive coping strategies Participants in this study will be referred by local neurologists and will meet diagnostic criteria for migraine and/or tension-type headache. Comprehensive assessments will be conducted before treatment and following 8 weeks of treatment (primary endpoint). Primary outcome measures will include: self-reported pain intensity and frequency of headaches and pain medication use. Secondary outcome variables will include measures of depression, anxiety, dysfunctional thinking, catastrophizing, cognitive coping and self-efficacy. It is predicted that patients who receive treatment will show significant treatment gains compared to the delayed treatment group. However it is expected that cognitive restructuring will result in greater treatment gains than coping skills training. The second aim of the study is to examine the effect of catastrophizing, a specific individual variable that has been shown to predict pain treatment success. Individuals who score high on measures of catastrophizing display poorer physical and psychosocial functioning. These individuals also evidence poorer response to treatment. It is hypothesized that baseline catastrophizing scores will be a predictor of treatment success. Participants who score higher on a measure of catastrophizing will show less improvement than individuals who score lower on this measure. However, catastrophizers will show greater relative improvement with cognitive restructuring than with coping skills training. Future research will consider the potential effects of combining these treatments as well as the impact of order of component presentation.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Cognitive Behavioral Chronic Pain Trial Among Rural Minorities and non-Minorities
Cognitive Behavioral Chronic Pain Trial Among Rural Minorities and non-Minorities
Comparison of Cognitive Treatments for Headache Pain
THE NEURAL SEPARABILITY OF OPIOID ANALGESIA & DEPENDENCE