The Decline and Resilience of Irony in Post-1989 Italian Literature.

点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要

My research focuses on the role of irony in post-1989 Italian literature. Since the 2000s, irony hasfrequently been associated with postmodernism, intellectual detachment, and meaningless playfulness.In a quite fierce debate, critics and writers have started to call for new forms of engagement andsincerity, in order to open new spaces for artists' and intellectuals' intervention in the public sphere.Irony has often been set aside, when not explicitly condemned as a dangerously two-faced or exhaustedtool, by authors such as David Foster Wallace and Wu Ming. On the other hand, the influence of theItalian tradition of ironic writers in the 20th century (e.g. Carlo Emilio Gadda, Italo Calvino, Umberto Eco)on contemporary artists makes the current Italian context particularly complex and unique. Therefore,my project analyses the use of irony by two Italian groups of writers active across this period (the Italianpulp cannibali in the 1990s and the Wu Ming collective in the 2000s) and in one specific genre (theautofiction production by Walter Siti, Tiziano Scarpa, and Michele Mari). It poses the question: is irony stillcutting edge? It aims to prove that irony, though theoretically dismissed, persists as a philosophical andpolitical attitude, rather than a mere figure of speech. It will demonstrate, in fact, that irony beyond thepostmodern is not just a tool for undermining sincerity or to amuse the reader, but rather can function forwriters as an incisive instrument to perform consistent and effective critique in the social sphere.