权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Problem-historical Nature and its Purposiveness

问题历史的本质及其目的性

基本信息

批准号：
2324690
负责人：
金额：
--
依托单位：
Kingston University
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Studentship
财政年份：
2019
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2019 至无数据
项目状态：
未结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2324690
关键词：
Problem historical Nature its Purposiveness

项目摘要

The proposed research is an investigation into the problem of the concept of "nature" in the Western philosophical tradition. It returns to an important but underappreciated debate between Kantianism and Nature Philosophy at the turn of the 19th century and addresses the relevance of this debate's irresolution to the current ecological turn in philosophy (and indeed to the idea of global warming more generally). The supposition is twofold: that the concept of nature has been (and remains) a consistent problem for Western philosophy and Critical Theory; and that nature itself (as the web of life) has become a specifically historical problem in the era of global warming. Proceeding from an analysis of the interconnection of these two problems, this project will go on to construct some means for moving beyond (without ignoring) the philosophical impasse of the former, and the political impasse of the latter. This construction will focus on a secular, post-Kantian concept of "faith" as the proper and necessary correlate to the peculiar object that is the natural world, of which global warming is an historical transformation - one that emerges in and through the actualisation of the bad idea of colonial and industrial capitalisms. The question then becomes:what might we postulate as a good idea; what should/could "we" have faith in? The answer is not simply the end of capitalism, which is itself no simple matter.

本研究是对西方哲学传统中“自然”概念问题的考察。它回到了一个重要的，但未得到充分重视的辩论康德主义和自然哲学之间的世纪之交和地址的相关性，这场辩论的悬而未决，目前的生态转向哲学（实际上，全球变暖的想法更普遍）。假设是双重的：自然的概念一直（并且仍然）是西方哲学和批判理论的一个一贯问题;自然本身（作为生命之网）已经成为全球变暖时代的一个特定历史问题。从分析这两个问题的相互联系出发，本项目将继续构建一些方法，以超越（而不忽视）前者的哲学僵局和后者的政治僵局。这种建构将集中于一种世俗的、后康德的“信仰”概念，将其视为与自然世界这一特殊对象的适当和必要的关联，全球变暖是自然世界的一种历史性转变--这种转变出现在殖民和工业资本主义的坏想法的实现之中。那么问题就变成了：我们可以假设什么是好主意;“我们”应该/可以相信什么？答案不仅仅是资本主义的终结，这本身就不是一件简单的事情。