Objectification, Sex, and Structural Injustice

物化、性别和结构性不公正

• 批准号: 2571951
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University College London
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2021
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2021 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2571951
• 关键词: Objectification; Sex; Structural; Injustice

The term 'objectification' is often used to criticise some objectionable part of our world, as evident in its use within feminist theory and political discourse. My research asks: what kind of criticism does the term 'objectification' make? Taking inspiration from the term's roots in feminist and social theory, I argue that we should understand objectification as a social-structural problem. This stands in opposition to the dominant philosophical idea that 'objectification' refers to individual acts of treating persons like mere objects. My research then considers some of the urgent questions which arise from taking the force of problematic social structures within our sexual lives seriously, including issues surrounding the relationship between structural injustice and individual agency, unjust conditions and sexual consent, and the regulation of intimacy.

“客观化”一词经常被用来批评我们世界上一些令人反感的部分，这在女权主义理论和政治话语中的使用中很明显。我的研究问：“客观化”这个术语是什么样的批评？从女权主义和社会理论中的术语根源的灵感，我认为，我们应该理解客观化作为一个社会结构问题。这与占主导地位的哲学思想相对立，即“客观化”指的是将人当作纯粹物体对待的个人行为。然后，我的研究考虑了一些紧迫的问题，这些问题是在我们的性生活中认真对待有问题的社会结构的力量所产生的，包括围绕结构性不公正与个人代理之间的关系，不公正的条件和性同意，以及亲密关系的监管。