权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Socially Engaged and Activist Art: new forms of archival practice in the contemporary art museum

社会参与和激进艺术：当代艺术博物馆档案实践的新形式

基本信息

批准号：
2595933
负责人：
金额：
--
依托单位：
University College London
依托单位国家：
英国
项目类别：
Studentship
财政年份：
2021
资助国家：
英国
起止时间：
2021 至无数据
项目状态：
未结题

来源：
https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2595933
关键词：
Socially Engaged Activist Art new

项目摘要

[16:15] Sarah HaylettThis doctoral research seeks to examine the nature, significance and collectibility of the traces left by programming and exhibiting activist and socially engaged art in the contemporary art museum. .This research will be rooted in the work of Tate Exchange who collaborate with artists and communities (especially those underrepresented in museums) to explore where art and society meet. While these collaborative processes do not necessarily make it into Tate's art collection, they create and leave traces. These traces include tangible material objects and intangible processes and experiences; they are records of these interactions and interventions, but are not recognised by Tate's established recordkeeping and archival structures. This leaves these items statusless and these moments of practice at risk. New forms of archival practice centre the record maker, rejecting 'epistemic totality' in favour of a model of pluralistic knowledge production and materiality outside of the archive. An important part of this research will include exploring what is lost and gained when activism becomes an artwork and is potentially fixed upon acquisition into the museum. Can the traces, if archived, extend the life of the activism? If we think of the Tate Exchange archive as a living archive, can the material continue to be used, researched and reactivated as new forms of activism? And by whom, how and where?

[16：15]莎拉·海瑟薇这个博士研究旨在研究的性质，意义和收藏留下的痕迹编程和展出活动家和社会参与的艺术在当代艺术博物馆。这项研究将植根于泰特艺术馆的工作，泰特艺术馆与艺术家和社区（特别是那些在博物馆中代表性不足的艺术家和社区）合作，探索艺术与社会的交汇点。虽然这些合作过程不一定会成为泰特的艺术收藏，但它们创造并留下了痕迹。这些痕迹包括有形的物质对象和无形的过程和经验;它们是这些互动和干预的记录，但不被泰特既定的记录和档案结构所承认。这使得这些项目的地位和这些时刻的做法处于危险之中。新形式的档案实践中心的记录制造商，拒绝“认识的总体性”有利于多元化的知识生产和档案馆外的物质模式。这项研究的一个重要部分将包括探索当行动主义成为一件艺术品时失去和获得的东西，并可能在博物馆收购时固定下来。这些痕迹如果存档，能延长行动主义的生命吗？如果我们把泰特美术馆的档案看作是一个活的档案，这些材料还能继续被使用、研究和重新激活，成为新形式的行动主义吗？谁干的，怎么干的，在哪儿干的？