The reception of Celsus' 'De medicina' from the middle ages to the modern era

从中世纪到现代对塞尔苏斯《医学》的接受

• 批准号: 2633013
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Cambridge
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2021
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2021 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2633013
• 关键词: reception; Celsus; De; medicina; middle

My project addresses the reception of Celsus' De medicina, which consists in eight book on Hippocratic medicine thatwere written in Latin in the first century AD. Its tradition concerns the history of medicine from antiquity to the modern era.I will focus on the main steps in the transmission of Celsus' text to explain different readings and the different purposes itwas employed for. By examining the manuscripts copied in Nonantola in the ninth and tenth century, I will address therole of monastic scriptoria and I will provide insights on medieval medical knowledge and bookmaking. Fifteenth-centuryFlorence is another crucial step in De medicina's history, as it was printed there for the first time in 1478. The membersof the Florentine Academia compared manuscript exemplars and debated on the editio princeps' philological accuracyand Celsus' identity. In addition to exploring the role of humanists and physicians in the printing house, my project willshed new light on the circulation of printed medical knowledge by taking into consideration the material spread of books,epistolary correspondence, and oral communication. In the sixteenth and seventeenth century, readers of De medicinahighlighted its medical and surgical contents and erudite medical circles fostered philosophical interpretations. Toaddress this themes, I will focus on the works of a few important authors in the Paduan and Bolognese medical arena,namely Falloppio, Malpighi, and Morgagni.

我的项目解决了赛尔苏斯的《德·梅迪纳》的接受问题，这本书包含了八本关于希波克拉底医学的书，这些书是在公元一世纪用拉丁文写成的。它的传统涉及从古代到现代的医学史。我将重点介绍赛尔苏文本传播的主要步骤，以解释不同的读物和它所用的不同目的。通过研究九世纪和十世纪在诺南托拉复制的手稿，我将讨论修道院圣经的作用，并提供对中世纪医学知识和书籍制作的见解。15世纪的佛罗伦萨是梅迪迪纳历史上的另一个关键步骤，因为它于1478年第一次在那里印刷。佛罗伦萨科学院的成员们比较了手稿样本，并就版本的文献学准确性和Celsus的身份进行了辩论。除了探索人文主义者和医生在印刷厂的作用外，我的项目还将通过考虑书籍的材料传播、书信通信和口头交流，为印刷医学知识的流通提供新的线索。在16世纪和17世纪，德医学的读者强调了它的内科和外科内容，博学的医学界促进了哲学解释。为了解决这一主题，我将重点介绍巴端和博洛尼亚医学领域的几位重要作家的作品，即费洛皮奥、马尔佩和莫加尼。