Critically exploring tensions between CRPD Article 25 and the NHS entitlements framework on migrant mental health in England: embedding perspectives a

该项目探讨了第25条CRPD和NHS之间的紧张关系，并解决了以下研究问题：什么道德，法律和政策方面的考虑通知NHS权利框架在英格兰有关移民心理健康？从人权的角度来看，与《残疾人权利公约》第25条的冲突在哪里？基于菲律宾移民妇女参与英国国民健康服务体系心理健康服务的经验，这些紧张关系产生了什么影响或生活影响（如果有的话）？如何重新设计国民保健服务的权利框架，以符合《残疾人权利公约》第25条的义务，并更能回应菲律宾移民妇女的生活经验？探索第25条与国民保健制度移民心理健康权利框架之间的紧张关系，对于确定法律中使系统性劣势或健康不平等长期存在的严重差距至关重要。这些差距需要对“健康正义”理由进行更深入的分析（普拉特，2021年）。根据《残疾人权利公约》，该项目将采用人权视角。这项研究属于ESRC的优先领域，因为它包括心理健康和Covid-19研究。该项目旨在缩小英国移民研究和全球精神卫生法的研究差距，其中包括：(1)菲律宾移民在研究开发和生产中的代表性不足；(2)全球大流行背景下影响移民心理健康的社会法律因素证据不足；(3)尽管健康地位下放，但总体上基于英国的健康移民研究缺乏区域差异（见Burns等人，2021年；Parkin， 2021年）。该研究将采用混合方法，通过法律文件审查和分析（Q1和Q3），结合理论和批判改革导向的分析，通过小片段和深入的半结构化定性访谈（Q2和Q3），对菲律宾移民妇女的生活经验进行实证现象学探索。这些方法有助于弥合与纯理论研究相关的弱点，即与法律对人和社会的实际影响的所谓“距离”（Watkins和Burton， 2017: 58）。

This project explores tensions between Article 25 CRPD and the NHS and addresses the following research questions:What ethical, legal, and policy considerations inform the NHS entitlements framework in England concerning migrant mental health? Applying a human rights lens, where might there be tensions with CRPD Article 25? What are the implications or lived effects (if any) produced by these tensions, based on the experiences of Filipino migrant women engaging with NHS mental health services in England? How might the NHS entitlements framework be redesigned to align with CRPD Article 25 obligations and be more responsive to the lived experiences of Filipino migrant women? Exploring tensions between Article 25 and the NHS entitlements framework on migrant mental health is essential to identify serious gaps in the law which perpetuate systematic disadvantage or health inequalities. These gaps warrant deeper analysis on 'health justice' grounds (Pratt, 2021). A human rights lens will be used for the project, in line with the CRPD. The research fits within the ESRC priority areas as it includes mental health and Covid-19 research. The project aims to narrow research gaps in UK migration research and global mental health law in general, which include: (1) underrepresentation of Filipino migrants in research development and production; (2) sparse evidence on the socio-legal determinants of migrant mental health amidst a global pandemic; and (3) lack of regional differentiation in general UK-based health migration research despite the devolved status of health (see Burns et al., 2021; Parkin, 2021). The research will adopt a mixed methods approach that combines doctrinal and critical reform-oriented analysis, through legal document review and analysis (Q1 and Q3), with an empirical phenomenological exploration of the lived experiences of Filipino migrant women, through vignettes and in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews (Q2 and Q3). These approaches help bridge associated weaknesses with purely doctrinal studies, namely the supposed 'distance' from the law's lived effects on people and society (Watkins and Burton, 2017: 58).