Critically exploring tensions between CRPD Article 25 and the NHS entitlements framework on migrant mental health in England: embedding perspectives a

批判性地探讨 CRPD 第 25 条与英格兰移民心理健康 NHS 权利框架之间的紧张关系：将观点纳入

• 批准号: 2723214
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Bristol
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2022 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2723214
• 关键词: Critically; exploring; tensions; between; CRPD

This project explores tensions between Article 25 CRPD and the NHS and addresses the following research questions:What ethical, legal, and policy considerations inform the NHS entitlements framework in England concerning migrant mental health? Applying a human rights lens, where might there be tensions with CRPD Article 25? What are the implications or lived effects (if any) produced by these tensions, based on the experiences of Filipino migrant women engaging with NHS mental health services in England? How might the NHS entitlements framework be redesigned to align with CRPD Article 25 obligations and be more responsive to the lived experiences of Filipino migrant women? Exploring tensions between Article 25 and the NHS entitlements framework on migrant mental health is essential to identify serious gaps in the law which perpetuate systematic disadvantage or health inequalities. These gaps warrant deeper analysis on 'health justice' grounds (Pratt, 2021). A human rights lens will be used for the project, in line with the CRPD. The research fits within the ESRC priority areas as it includes mental health and Covid-19 research. The project aims to narrow research gaps in UK migration research and global mental health law in general, which include: (1) underrepresentation of Filipino migrants in research development and production; (2) sparse evidence on the socio-legal determinants of migrant mental health amidst a global pandemic; and (3) lack of regional differentiation in general UK-based health migration research despite the devolved status of health (see Burns et al., 2021; Parkin, 2021). The research will adopt a mixed methods approach that combines doctrinal and critical reform-oriented analysis, through legal document review and analysis (Q1 and Q3), with an empirical phenomenological exploration of the lived experiences of Filipino migrant women, through vignettes and in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews (Q2 and Q3). These approaches help bridge associated weaknesses with purely doctrinal studies, namely the supposed 'distance' from the law's lived effects on people and society (Watkins and Burton, 2017: 58).

该项目探讨了第25条CRPD与NHS之间的紧张关系，并解决了以下研究问题：哪些道德，法律和政策考虑因素为NHS权利框架涉及移民心理健康的框架吗？应用人权镜头，CRPD第25条可能在哪里有紧张关系？根据菲律宾移民妇女与英格兰的NHS心理健康服务的经历，这些紧张局势产生了什么含义或生命影响（如果有）？ NHS权利框架如何重新设计以与CRPD第25条的义务保持一致，并对菲律宾移民妇女的生活经历更加敏感？探索第25条和NHS权利框架上有关移民心理健康的紧张局势对于确定法律上的严重差距至关重要，这些差距使系统的劣势或健康不平等永久化。这些差距需要对“卫生正义”理由进行更深入的分析（Pratt，2021）。与CRPD一致的项目将使用人权镜头。该研究适合ESRC优先领域，因为它包括心理健康和Covid-19。该项目旨在缩小英国移民研究和全球心理健康法的研究差距，其中包括：（1）菲律宾移民在研究开发和生产中的代表性不足； （2）在全球大流行中，移民心理健康的社会法律决定因素的稀疏证据； （3）尽管健康状况下降了，但在英国一般的健康移民研究中缺乏区域分化（参见Burns等，2021； Parkin，2021）。这项研究将采用一种混合方法方法，通过法律文件审查和分析（Q1和Q3）结合了教义和批判性改革的分析，以及对菲律宾移民妇女的生活经验的经验现象学探索，Vignettes和深入的半结构性定性访谈（Q2和Q3）。这些方法有助于通过纯粹的教义研究弥合相关的弱点，即与法律对人与社会的生命影响的“距离”（Watkins and Burton，2017：58）。