Critically exploring tensions between CRPD Article 25 and the NHS entitlements framework on migrant mental health in England: embedding perspectives a

批判性地探讨 CRPD 第 25 条与英格兰移民心理健康 NHS 权利框架之间的紧张关系：将观点纳入

• 批准号: 2723214
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Bristol
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2022 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2723214
• 关键词: Critically; exploring; tensions; between; CRPD

This project explores tensions between Article 25 CRPD and the NHS and addresses the following research questions:What ethical, legal, and policy considerations inform the NHS entitlements framework in England concerning migrant mental health? Applying a human rights lens, where might there be tensions with CRPD Article 25? What are the implications or lived effects (if any) produced by these tensions, based on the experiences of Filipino migrant women engaging with NHS mental health services in England? How might the NHS entitlements framework be redesigned to align with CRPD Article 25 obligations and be more responsive to the lived experiences of Filipino migrant women? Exploring tensions between Article 25 and the NHS entitlements framework on migrant mental health is essential to identify serious gaps in the law which perpetuate systematic disadvantage or health inequalities. These gaps warrant deeper analysis on 'health justice' grounds (Pratt, 2021). A human rights lens will be used for the project, in line with the CRPD. The research fits within the ESRC priority areas as it includes mental health and Covid-19 research. The project aims to narrow research gaps in UK migration research and global mental health law in general, which include: (1) underrepresentation of Filipino migrants in research development and production; (2) sparse evidence on the socio-legal determinants of migrant mental health amidst a global pandemic; and (3) lack of regional differentiation in general UK-based health migration research despite the devolved status of health (see Burns et al., 2021; Parkin, 2021). The research will adopt a mixed methods approach that combines doctrinal and critical reform-oriented analysis, through legal document review and analysis (Q1 and Q3), with an empirical phenomenological exploration of the lived experiences of Filipino migrant women, through vignettes and in-depth semi-structured qualitative interviews (Q2 and Q3). These approaches help bridge associated weaknesses with purely doctrinal studies, namely the supposed 'distance' from the law's lived effects on people and society (Watkins and Burton, 2017: 58).

该项目探讨了《残疾人权利公约》第25条与国民保健制度之间的紧张关系，并解决了以下研究问题：英格兰国民保健制度关于移民心理健康的权利框架是如何考虑道德、法律的和政策因素的？从人权透镜的角度看，与《残疾人权利公约》第二十五条的冲突可能在哪里？根据菲律宾移民妇女在英国接受NHS心理健康服务的经历，这些紧张局势产生了什么影响或生活影响（如果有的话）？如何重新设计国民保健制度应享权利框架，使之符合《残疾人权利公约》第25条的义务，并更好地适应菲律宾移民妇女的生活经历？探讨第25条和NHS关于移民心理健康的权利框架之间的紧张关系，对于确定法律中存在的严重差距至关重要，这些差距使系统性劣势或健康不平等永久化。这些差距需要在“健康正义”的基础上进行更深入的分析（普拉特，2021）。该项目将根据《残疾人权利公约》采用人权透镜。该研究符合ESRC的优先领域，因为它包括心理健康和Covid-19研究。该项目旨在缩小英国移民研究和全球精神卫生法的研究差距，其中包括：（1）菲律宾移民在研究开发和生产中的代表性不足;（2）在全球流行病中移民精神健康的社会法律决定因素的证据不足;和（3）尽管健康状况有所下降，但在一般的英国健康移民研究中缺乏区域差异（见Burns等人，2021; Parkin，2021）。研究将采用混合方法，通过法律的文件审查和分析（第1和第3季度），将理论和批判性改革导向分析与通过小插曲和深入的半结构化定性访谈（第2和第3季度）对菲律宾移民妇女的生活经历进行实证现象学探索相结合。这些方法有助于弥合纯理论研究的相关弱点，即与法律对人和社会的生活影响的所谓“距离”（Watkins和Burton，2017：58）。