Personhood to Animalhood, Hostility to Sanctuary, Animal Rights to Human Wrongs: A Case for a New Legal Framework for Animals Out-of-Place

这项研究不同于主流的法律哲学叙事，即将人权延伸到动物身上是最好的结果。我不是试图调和或强调人/动物的差异来分别为动物权利辩护或反对，而是将重点放在动物经历的独特性上，以此作为立法保护动物的基础；我称之为‘动物身份’。通过研究美国的动物人身保护令案例，我在法律、法国研究和哲学等学科中形成了敌意和庇护的概念。从移民法和动物法之间正在出现的对话中获得灵感，我建议建立一个框架，专注于动物的非比较动物身份，而不是以人类权利为中心的修辞。

This study diverges from the dominant juridico-philosophical narrative that views the extension of human rights to animals as the optimal outcome. Rather than seeking to reconcile or emphasize human/animal differences to argue for or against animal rights respectively, I focus on the uniqueness of animal experiences as the basis for their legislative protection; termed 'animalhood'. Studying US animal habeas corpus cases, I develop the concepts of hostility and sanctuary across the disciplines of law, French studies, and philosophy. Drawing inspiration from the emerging dialogue between immigration and animal law, I suggest a framework focussing on animals' non-comparative animalhood outside of an anthropocentric rights-based rhetoric.