Personhood to Animalhood, Hostility to Sanctuary, Animal Rights to Human Wrongs: A Case for a New Legal Framework for Animals Out-of-Place

这项研究与主流的司法哲学叙事不同，后者认为将人权扩展到动物身上是最佳结果。我并没有试图调和或强调人与动物之间的差异来分别支持或反对动物权利，而是把重点放在动物经验的独特性上，以此作为立法保护动物的基础；称为“animalhood”。通过研究美国动物人身保护令案例，我在法律、法国研究和哲学等学科中发展了敌意和庇护的概念。从移民和动物法之间的对话中获得灵感，我建议在以人类为中心的权利为基础的修辞之外，建立一个关注动物非比较性的框架。

This study diverges from the dominant juridico-philosophical narrative that views the extension of human rights to animals as the optimal outcome. Rather than seeking to reconcile or emphasize human/animal differences to argue for or against animal rights respectively, I focus on the uniqueness of animal experiences as the basis for their legislative protection; termed 'animalhood'. Studying US animal habeas corpus cases, I develop the concepts of hostility and sanctuary across the disciplines of law, French studies, and philosophy. Drawing inspiration from the emerging dialogue between immigration and animal law, I suggest a framework focussing on animals' non-comparative animalhood outside of an anthropocentric rights-based rhetoric.