Personhood to Animalhood, Hostility to Sanctuary, Animal Rights to Human Wrongs: A Case for a New Legal Framework for Animals Out-of-Place

这项研究偏离了占主导地位的司法哲学叙事，认为将人权扩展到动物是最佳结果。而不是寻求调和或强调人类/动物的差异，主张或反对动物权利分别，我专注于动物经验的独特性作为其立法保护的基础;称为“动物性”。研究美国动物人身保护令的情况下，我开发的敌意和避难所的概念，法律，法国研究和哲学的学科。从移民和动物法之间正在出现的对话中汲取灵感，我建议一个框架，专注于动物的非比较动物性以外的以权利为基础的修辞。

This study diverges from the dominant juridico-philosophical narrative that views the extension of human rights to animals as the optimal outcome. Rather than seeking to reconcile or emphasize human/animal differences to argue for or against animal rights respectively, I focus on the uniqueness of animal experiences as the basis for their legislative protection; termed 'animalhood'. Studying US animal habeas corpus cases, I develop the concepts of hostility and sanctuary across the disciplines of law, French studies, and philosophy. Drawing inspiration from the emerging dialogue between immigration and animal law, I suggest a framework focussing on animals' non-comparative animalhood outside of an anthropocentric rights-based rhetoric.