Fostering generational cooperation between Generation Z and Generations X & Y on water security - a common global concern of humankind, cooperative so

这项研究将在国际安全、粮食安全、能源安全和环境安全等相互关联的新的全球挑战的背景下，从全球公民的角度，特别是Z X代和Y世代的角度，挑战局限于国家主权、军事安全方法的全球水安全问题。水安全的全球环境层面没有被整合，主权不再能够为淡水法提供主要基础(Grey&Garrick 2013：3，Magsig，2017：388)，因此根据经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的S基线环境展望，到2050年，预计将有近40亿人生活在严重缺水的流域(OECD，2012年)。80%的全球人口生活在水安全受到高度威胁的地区(Vorosmarty、CJ等人)。2010年在加里克和霍尔，2014：611)“国内和国际水资源法律和政策都不足以应对这一全球现象带来的挑战或适应似乎不可避免的额外后果”(埃克斯坦，2009：412)。立即重新制定国际法需要以下框架影响：-对水和环境采取非国家侵入性方法--金融家决心在水上投资数万亿美元。--进行全球公开辩论，以加快这一进程。上述方法需要很大的说服力，包括审查集体安全的演变性质和国际水法的[修订]作用(Magsig 2011：343；Magsig 2015：139)。因此，迫切需要说服(Z、X和Y世代)更广泛的公众参与水安全辩论，在这个21世纪，就政策制定者(联合国安理会、八国集团、北约)和金融家(世界银行、国际货币基金组织和世贸组织)在多大程度上无视跨学科学术机构的迫切呼吁而言，水安全辩论在今天变得紧迫起来，因为当水安全危机与[国际和平]和气候变化相关时，这一呼吁已经变得紧迫(Cullet等人，2021：13)。在Greta Thunberg的环境抗议中，显然有能力将关于具有挑战性的问题的辩论转向正确的方向，即气候变化。

The research will challenge the global water security issues confined within state-sovereignty, military security approach from the perspectives of global citizens in particular cohorts of Gen Z X and Y in the context of interlinked emerging global challenges, such as international security, food security, energy security and environment security. The global environment dimensions of water security are not integrated, and sovereignty is no longer capable of providing the primary foundation for freshwater law (Grey & Garrick 2013:3, Magsig, 2017: 388) as a result almost 4 billion people are projected to live in severely water-stressed basins by 2050 according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)'s baseline environmental outlook (OECD, 2012 in (Garrick and Hall, 2014: 611). Eighty percent of the global population lives in regions experiencing high threats to water security (Vorosmarty CJ et al. 2010 in Garrik and Hall, 2014:611) 'Both domestic and international water laws and policies are inadequate to meet the challenges posed by this global phenomenon or to adapt to the additional consequences that appear to be inevitable' (Eckstein, 2009:412). For immediate reformulation of international law requires the following framework implications:-Non-state invasive approach to water and environment-Financiers' determination to invest trillions in water.-A global public debate to hasten the process. These above approaches require a great deal of convincing, including an examination of the evolving nature of collective security and the [revised]role of international water law (Magsig 2011: 343; Magsig 2015: 139). Therefore, there is an urgent need of convincing wider public participation(Gen Z, X and Y) in water security debates which in this 21st century 'has become urgent today in regard to the extent to which the policy makers (The UN security council, G8, NATO) and financiers(WB, IMF and WTO) are ignoring the urgent call from the transdisciplinary scholarships when the water security crises linked to [international peace] and climate change'(Cullet et al.2021:13). The ability to shift debates in the right direction on challenging issues i.e., climate change is evidently prevalent in Greta Thunberg's environmental protest.