A Comparative History of Judicial Referencing in the United Kingdom and Germany

英国和德国司法参考的比较历史

• 批准号: 2890515
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: University of Cambridge
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2023 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2890515
• 关键词: Comparative; History; Judicial; Referencing; United

The research project aims at a comparative-historical analysis of quoting and citing as employed by courts in the United Kingdom and Germany. This addresses two main research questions: How and why do courts incorporate quotations and citations in their judgments? And how have these techniques evolved under varying circumstances in different legal systems? Given the ubiquity of referencing in judgements, this research is highly relevant for the transparency and persuasiveness of judicial decision-making. In addition to the methodologies of comparative-historical jurisprudence, my research draws on linguistics to examine the means and ends of judicial referencing. The mainsection is dedicated to a comparative history of these techniques in the United Kingdom and Germany in the late 19th and the early 21st century. Given the importance of the organisation of courts for judicial referencing, the period of the Judicature Acts (1873/1875) and the German Reichsjustizgesetze (1877/1879) allows for a comparison of judicial referencing in a common law and a civil law system against the backdrop of a reorganised court structure. Contrasting this withjudicial referencing in the 21st century, Mr Wieschollek intends to shed light on the impact of technical innovations and European (dis-)integration on judicial referencing

该研究项目旨在对英国和德国法院使用的引用和引用进行比较历史分析。这解决了两个主要的研究问题：法院如何以及为什么在他们的判决中纳入引文和引用？在不同的法律制度下，这些技术是如何在不同的情况下演变的？鉴于在判决中普遍存在的引用，本研究与司法决策的透明度和说服力高度相关。除了比较历史法学的方法论之外，我的研究还利用语言学来研究司法引用的手段和目的。主要部分致力于19世纪末和21世纪初英国和德国这些技术的比较历史。考虑到法院组织对司法参考的重要性，《司法法案》（1873/1875）和德国《帝国司法法》（1877/1879）时期允许在重组法院结构的背景下比较普通法和大陆法系的司法参考。将其与21世纪的司法参照进行对比，Wieschollek先生打算阐明技术创新和欧洲（解体）一体化对司法参照的影响