An Epistemic Critique of Rape Fact-Finding

对强奸事实调查的认知批评

• 批准号: 2904656
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: London School of Economics and Political Science
• 依托单位国家: 英国
• 项目类别: Studentship
• 财政年份: 2023
• 资助国家: 英国
• 起止时间: 2023 至 无数据
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=studentship-2904656
• 关键词: Epistemic; Critique; Rape; Fact; Finding

Rape is not some figment of our imagination. Yet, criminal systems often fail to acknowledge the facts of the matter in rape cases. Only 1.3% of the recorded rape offences in England and Wales ended in a charge or summons (House of Commons Committee, 2022). Evidentiary systems are equipped to consider, e.g., the value of a suspect's fingerprints on a murder weapon as evidence of their guilt. However, evidence-based accounts of rape often seem distorted. The project aims to explore rape fact-finding. I intend to propose a novel epistemic theory that can assess evidence-collection procedures in rape cases.

强奸不是我们想象力的一定程度。然而，犯罪制度通常无法承认强奸案中此事的事实。英格兰和威尔士记录的强奸罪中只有1.3％以指控或传票结束（下议院委员会，2022年）。证据系统有能力考虑，例如，犯罪嫌疑人在谋杀武器上的指纹的价值作为其有罪的证据。但是，基于证据的强奸案例似乎往往扭曲了。该项目旨在探索强奸事实发现。我打算提出一种新的认知理论，该理论可以评估强奸案中的证据收集程序。