Socioeconomic Heterogeneity in the Impact of Psychiatric Care: A Secondary Analysis of the RAISE-ETP Trial for Patients with First-Episode Psychosis
Socioeconomic Heterogeneity in the Impact of Psychiatric Care: A Secondary Analysis of the RAISE-ETP Trial for Patients with First-Episode Psychosis
批准号:
10305685
负责人:
Daniel Mark Bennett
金额:
$8.25万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2020
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2020-12-01 至 2022-11-30
关键词:
AddressAdherenceAdultAffectCaringCharacteristicsClinicalClinical TrialsCognitionDataEarly InterventionEarly intervention trialsEconomicsEducationEffectivenessEmployment OpportunitiesEquilibriumHealth Services AccessibilityHeterogeneityHomelessnessIndividualInequalityInterventionLeadLifeMeasuresMental HealthMental Health ServicesNational Institute of Mental HealthOccupationalPatientsPatternPersonsPoliciesPopulationPopulation HeterogeneityPsychiatric therapeutic procedurePsychosesQuality of lifeRaceRehabilitation therapyResearchResearch PersonnelSchizophreniaSiteSocioeconomic FactorsSocioeconomic StatusSourceSubstance abuse problemSymptomsTreatment EffectivenessTreatment FactorUnemploymentViolencebaseclinical research siteeffective interventioneffective therapyempowermentexperiencefallsfirst episode psychosishealth disparityhealth inequalitiesimprovedindexingintervention effectintervention programlow socioeconomic statuspsychiatric rehabilitationresponsesecondary analysissevere mental illnesssocialsocial stigmasocioeconomicssubstance usetreatment adherencetreatment effect
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Using data from the NIMH-sponsored RAISE-ETP trial, this study examines socioeconomic barriers to the effec-
tive provision of psychiatric care. RAISE investigators found modest benefits of an early-intervention program
for patients with first-episode psychosis. Our preliminary analysis suggests a large and statistically significant
gap in which only high-SES patients benefitted from the intervention. We will examine possible explanations for
this pattern, including SES differences in initial mental health, stigma, treatment adherence, cognition, substance
abuse, and economic empowerment. Finally we will quantify the contribution of this pattern for the SES gap in
mental health. This inquiry is distinct from any analysis that the RAISE investigators have proposed or carried
out.
期刊论文(1)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金