Planning and Evaluation Core

摘要|规划和评价核心 庞塞健康科学大学-莫菲特癌症中心的规划和评估核心（PEC） （公共卫生股-千年挑战中心）伙伴关系监测和评价实现千年发展目标的进展情况， 该伙伴关系的所有领域，包括研究，教育和社区外展的目标。的PEC 作为问责的中心节点，确保伙伴关系实现拟议目标， 通过其评估框架。消除多氯联苯俱乐部的评价过程允许行政核心 (AC)最大限度地利用资源，确定伙伴关系的新方向，并报告伙伴关系的进展情况 核心和研究人员的机构领导人和国家癌症研究所（NCI）。PEC认为， 支持伙伴关系战略规划、监测和评价的内部和外部咨询小组 通过评估目标、活动、产出和预期结果之间的关系来评估活动。两 PEC的主要咨询小组是内部咨询委员会（IAC）和计划指导委员会 （PSC）。临时咨询委员会和方案支助委员会在消除多氯联苯俱乐部内密切合作， AC。PEC为每个伙伴关系组件建立逻辑模型，并提供持续更新， 反映伙伴关系的新目标、活动和演变。消除多氯联苯俱乐部与定量 科学核心（QSC），实施了使用REDCap跟踪赠款和出版物（包括期刊影响 因素）提交和获得的伙伴关系的研究人员，以简化跟踪。消除多氯联苯俱乐部是 促进癌症健康公平评估者特别兴趣小组（PACHE SIG）， 确定在国家一级评估PACHE计划的共同要素。消除多氯联苯俱乐部将在 以必要的灵活性来适应和应对新出现的挑战，创新， 发展理念PEC的具体目标是：1）协调收集、跟踪和分析评价 伙伴关系各组成部分、进程和活动的数据。这为AC提供了所需的关键数据， 发起、终止或修改新的和正在进行的倡议，以实现伙伴关系的目标和目的。的 PEC结合了逻辑模型，基于网络的关系数据系统，用于跟踪结果， 伙伴关系成员调查，以监测和评估沟通、互动和 在两个机构的伙伴关系组成部分之间进行整合。2)进行内部评估 通过临时行政理事会的活动建立伙伴关系。临时咨询委员会将审查 核心和研究项目，并提供总结性反馈。IAC还将与AC合作， 评估新的研究项目。3)对伙伴关系各组成部分进行外部评价， 方案支助委员会的活动和一名外部评价顾问。PSC提供公正、严谨和专业的 每年评估伙伴关系的进展情况，并建议在整个赠款期间进行改进 与AC的季度会议。

ABSTRACT | PLANNING AND EVALUATION CORE (PEC) The Planning and Evaluation Core (PEC) of the Ponce Health Sciences University-Moffitt Cancer Center (PHSU-MCC) Partnership monitors and evaluates progress toward the implementation of the goals and objectives of the Partnership across all areas including research, education, and community outreach. The PEC serves as a central node for accountability and ensures that the Partnership is completing proposed aims and objectives through its evaluative framework. The PEC evaluation processes allow for the Administrative Core (AC) to maximize resources, identify novel directions for the Partnership, and report the progress of Partnership cores and investigators to institutional leaders and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The PEC maintains internal and external advisory groups to support strategic planning, monitoring, and evaluation of Partnership activities by assessing the relationships between aims, activities, outputs, and expected outcomes. The two essential PEC advisory groups are the Internal Advisory Committee (IAC), and the Program Steering Committee (PSC). The IAC and PSC work closely together within the PEC to provide guidance and recommendations to the AC. The PEC establishes Logic Models for each Partnership component and provides continual updating to reflect the new aims, activities, and evolution of the Partnership. The PEC, in collaboration with the Quantitative Sciences Core (QSC), implemented the use of REDCap to track grants and publications (including journal impact factors) submitted and obtained by the Partnership researchers to streamline tracking. The PEC is a member of the Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity Evaluators Special Interest Group (PACHE SIG), which works to identify common elements for the evaluation of PACHE programs at the national level. The PEC will build on prior successes with the necessary flexibility to adapt and respond to emerging challenges, innovations, and developments. The specific aims of the PEC are: 1) Coordinate collection, tracking, and analysis of evaluation data for Partnership components processes and activities. This provides the AC with critical data needed to initiate, terminate, or modify new and ongoing initiatives to achieve the Partnership goals and objectives. The PEC incorporates Logic Models, web-based relational data systems for tracking outcomes, and annual Partnership member surveys to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of communications, interactions, and integration between/across Partnership components at both institutions. 2) Conduct internal evaluations of Partnership components through the activities of the IAC. The IAC will review quarterly progress reports for the Cores and research projects and provide summative feedback. The IAC will also collaborate with the AC to solicit and evaluate new research projects. 3) Implement external evaluations of Partnership components through the activities of the PSC and an external evaluation consultant. The PSC provides unbiased, rigorous, and expert evaluation of the progress of the Partnership annually and recommends improvements throughout the grant period via quarterly meetings with the AC.