Controversies of legal interpretation: a philosophical investigation of reasoning and adjudication in some recent contentious cases

法律解释之争：对近期若干诉讼案件说理裁判的哲学考察

• 批准号: ARC : DP0343947
• 金额: $ 25万
• 依托单位: The University of Melbourne
• 依托单位国家: 澳大利亚
• 项目类别: Discovery Projects
• 财政年份: 2003
• 资助国家: 澳大利亚
• 起止时间: 2003-01-01 至 2007-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://researchdata.edu.au/controversies-legal-interpretation-contentious-cases/70295
• 关键词: Controversies; legal; interpretation; philosophical; investigation

Controversies of legal interpretation: a philosophical investigation of reasoning and adjudication in some recent contentious cases. A series of High Court decisions in Australia since the 1980's generated a public controversy about the role of moral and political values in adjudication. It has been charged that judges are engaged, not in an exercise of technical legal interpretation, but rather in illegitimate and politically partisan ?judicial activism.? The project investigates the theoretical and applied questions of legal interpretation implicit in this argument. It rejects the charge of judicial activism. It proposes a ?value-maximizing? theory of reasoning and interpretation that characterizes adjudication in contentious cases as precisely a process of theorizing about relevant moral and political values.

法律的解释之争：对近期若干争议案件中推理与裁判的哲学考察。自20世纪80年代以来，澳大利亚高等法院的一系列裁决引发了公众对道德和政治价值观在裁决中的作用的争议。有人指责法官不是在从事技术性的法律的解释，而是在从事非法的和政治上的偏袒？司法能动主义该项目调查的理论和应用问题的法律的解释隐含在这一论点。它拒绝司法能动主义的指控。它提出了一个？价值最大化一种推理和解释的理论，其特点是在有争议的案件中的裁决是对相关的道德和政治价值进行理论化的过程。