Climate, erosion & sediment dynamics: Investigating controls on landscape evolution

景观演化模型（LEMs）整合了我们对水文地貌过程的最佳理解，并提供了系统评估和测试与环境强迫、地表过程和固体地球动力学之间相互作用有关的假设的机会。然而，我们的LEMs的一个关键是我们对河流的理解，河流控制着当地的地形起伏，并设定了区域侵蚀率。虽然几十年来基于过程的研究提高了我们对塑造地球表面的巨大、非线性和相互作用过程的理解，但我们对河流过程的理解仍然存在重大差距，这限制了我们准确预测景观演变的能力。因此，我的研究计划将集中在两个相互关联的问题上：1)当地降水对基岩河流岩石可蚀性和侵蚀的影响，以及2)河流网络对变化的水文地貌通量的响应行为。首先，我最近在夏威夷的工作提供了第一个证据，证明河床的可蚀性可以通过当地依赖于降雨的化学风化来调节。此外，这一过程被证明影响基岩河流侵蚀的速率和模式。因此，我的第一个目标是确定这种效应是否也在其他景观中观察到，特别是不列颠哥伦比亚省（BC）的降水梯度。通过实地考察、实验室岩石强度测试和河流剖面分析，HQP和我将评估这些气候侵蚀趋势以及可变地质和构造的影响。其次，北美西部野火活动的增加导致洪水和侵蚀的急剧增加，这为评估流域尺度对水和沉积物脉冲输入的控制和响应提供了机会。我的团队最近的工作集中在建立最先进的流域尺度沉积物动力学模型，以预测野火后的供水风险。这些模型现在为沉积物扰动后流域控制沉积物连通性的广泛地质统计分析提供了新的机会，也为预测火灾后的反应提供了框架。因此，通过运行这些模型并在卑诗省进行火灾后的现场监测研究，我们将提高我们对这些地区河网和渠道形态动力学中沉积物瓶颈控制的理解。解决这些目标将促进我们对河流过程的理解，并填补关键的知识空白，这些空白限制了lem在地质时间尺度上预测地球表面动力学的能力。此外，这项研究将解决加拿大的关键环境问题，加拿大被基岩河流解剖，正在经历越来越多的野火活动。改善LEMs，特别是与气候侵蚀相互作用和火灾干扰有关的LEMs，将使加拿大人更好地为未来的风险做好准备，并为快速变化的环境制度下的资源管理提供信息。

Landscape evolution models (LEMs) integrate our best understanding of hydro-geomorphic processes and provide the opportunity to systematically evaluate and test hypotheses related to the interactions among environmental forcing, surface processes, and solid Earth dynamics. However, a linchpin in our LEMs is our understanding of rivers, which control local topographic relief and set regional erosion rates. While decades of process-based studies have improved our understanding of the vast, non-linear and interacting processes shaping Earth's surface, there are still critical gaps in our understanding of fluvial processes that limit our ability to accurately predict landscape evolution. Thus, my research program will focus on two inter-related problems: 1) the effects of local precipitation on rock erodibility and erosion in bedrock rivers, and 2) the response behavior of river networks to changing hydro-geomorphic fluxes. First, my recent work in Hawai'i provided the first evidence that streambed erodibility can be modulated by local rainfall-dependent chemical weathering. Further, this process was shown to influence the rates and patterns of bedrock river erosion. My first objective is, therefore, to establish whether this effect is also observed in other landscapes, specifically the precipitation gradient across British Columbia (BC). Using a combination of fieldwork, laboratory rock strength testing, and river profile analysis, HQP and I will evaluate these climate-erosion trends and the influence of variable geology and tectonics. Second, increasing wildfire activity in western North America is leading to dramatic increases in flooding and erosion, which provides the opportunity to evaluate the watershed-scale controls of and responses to pulsed inputs of water and sediment. My group's recent work has focused on building state-of-the-art models of watershed-scale sediment dynamics to predict water supply risks after wildfire. These models now provide a novel opportunity for widespread geostatistical analysis of watershed controls on sediment connectivity following sediment disturbances, as well as a framework for predicting post-fire response. Thus, by running these models and conducting post-fire field monitoring studies in BC, we will advance our understanding of the controls on sediment bottlenecks in river networks and channels morphodynamics in these locations. Addressing these objectives will advance our understanding of fluvial processes and fill critical knowledge gaps that limit the ability of LEMs to predict Earth surface dynamics over geologic timescales. Further, this research will tackle key environmental issues in Canada, which is dissected by bedrock rivers and is experiencing increasing wildfire activity. Improving LEMs, particularly as they relate to climate-erosion interactions and fire disturbance, will better prepare Canadians for future risks and inform resource management under rapidly changing environmental regimes.