Local Projective Model Structures on Simplicial Presheaves
Local Projective Model Structures on Simplicial Presheaves
复制标题
单纯预滑轮上的局部射影模型结构
DOI:
10.1023/a:1013302313123
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Benjamin A. Blander
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Benjamin A. Blander
We give a model structure on the category of simplicial presheaves on some essentially small Grothendieck site T . When T is the Nisnevich site it specializes to a proper simplicial model category with the same weak equivalences as in [MV], but with fewer cofibrations and consequently more fibrations. This allows a simpler proof of the comparison theorem of [V2], one which makes no use of ∆-closed classes. The purpose of this note is to introduce different model structures on the categories of simplicial presheaves and simplicial sheaves on some essentially small Grothendieck site T and to give some applications of these simplified model categories. In particular, we prove that the stable homotopy categories SH((Sm/k)Nis, A 1) and SH((Sch/k)cdh, A 1) are equivalent. This result was first proven by Voevodsky in [V2] and our proof uses many of his techniques, but it does not use his theory of ∆-closed classes developed in [V3]. 1. The local projective model structure on presheaves We first recall some of the other well-known model structures on simplicial presheaves. Definition 1.1. A map f : X → Y of simplicial presheaves (or sheaves) is a local weak equivalence if f∗ : π0(X) → π0(Y ) induces an isomorphism of associated sheaves and, for all U ∈ T , f∗ : πn(X,x) → πn(Y, f(x)) induces an isomorphism of associated sheaves on T/U for any choice of basepoint x ∈ X(U). The map f is a sectionwise weak equivalence (respectively sectionwise fibration) if for all U ∈ T , the map f(U) : X(U) → Y (U) is a weak equivalence (respectively Kan fibration) of simplicial sets. Heller [He] discovered a model structure on simplicial presheaves whose weak equivalences are the sectionwise weak equivalences. We will refer to his model structure as the injective model structure. Date: January 11, 2001. I would like to thank Dan Isaksen for his many helpful suggestions, and I thank my adviser Peter May for his encouragement and careful reading of many drafts. I am also grateful to Vladimir Voevodsky for noticing an error in an earlier version and for his work that inspired this note. 1