Agreeableness: dimension of personality or social desirability artifact?

Agreeableness: dimension of personality or social desirability artifact?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/1467-6494.05021
复制
发表时间:
2002-10
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
W. Graziano;R. M. Tobin
W. Graziano;R. M. Tobin
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
W. Graziano;R. M. Tobin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

宜人性与社会价值特征和亲社会动机有关,因此自我报告的宜人性可能会被利己主义偏见(SFB)扭曲。一项由三项研究组成的多方法研究计划从三个角度探索了宜人性的五大维度与家庭满意度之间的联系。首先,我们考察了宜人性和SFB测量之间的零级关系(N=316)。接下来,我们使用循环法设计(N=351)和社会关系模型分析(Kenny,1994),将宜人性知觉划分为目标效应和感知者效应。这些影响与SFB的担忧有关,以及对操纵宜人性的社会期望的不同反应。研究3(N=312)考察了宜人性的操纵方式,作为性情宜人性与人际冲突策略之间关系的调节变量。总体而言,结果表明,宜人性不容易被SFB操纵或扭曲。作为一个实质性的动机系统,结果从宜人性的角度进行了讨论。
Agreeableness is linked to socially valued traits and prosocial motives, so self-reported Agreeableness may be distorted by self-favoring biases (SFB). A three-study multimethod research program explored links between the Big Five dimension of Agreeableness and SFB from three perspectives. First, we examined zero-order relations between Agreeableness and SFB measures (N = 316). Next, we used a round robin design (N = 351) and the Social Relations Model analyses (Kenny, 1994) to partition perceptions of Agreeableness into target and perceiver effects. These effects then were related to SFB concerns, and differential responsiveness to a manipulation of the social desirability of Agreeableness. Study 3 (N = 312) examined a manipulation of Agreeableness as a moderator of the relation between dispositional Agreeableness and interpersonal conflict tactics. Overall, results indicate that Agreeableness is not easily manipulated nor distorted by SFB. Results are discussed in terms of Agreeableness as a substantive system of motives.