On Peers, Those ‘Particular Friends’
On Peers, Those ‘Particular Friends’
复制标题
关于同龄人，那些“特别的朋友”
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Désautels
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Larochelle;J. Désautels
作为科学制度化的产物，同行享有特权，使他们成为科学实践结构中的关键行为者。事实上，作为裁判，他们被赋予了巨大的政治权力，因为他们的职能不再局限于仅仅证明或证明：他们必须评估。罗伯特·波义耳所构想的学术写作，以及它向带有认可的写作的转变，是我们讨论这一方面的出发点，这一方面也是科学教育的重要组成部分。
As an outgrowth of the institutionalisation of science, peers have come to enjoy a prerogative making them key actors in the configuration of the exercise of science. Indeed, as referees, they have been endowed with an enormous political power in that their function no longer restricts them to merely certifying or attesting: they have to assess. Scholarly writing, as conceived of by Robert Boyle, coupled with its transformation into writing bearing an imprimatur, serves as the starting point of our discussion of this aspect which is also part and parcel of science education.