Towards productive science-policy interfaces : A research agenda
Towards productive science-policy interfaces : A research agenda
复制标题
迈向富有成效的科学政策界面：研究议程
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Runhaar
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. I. V. Enst;P. Driessen;H. Runhaar
由于知识的战略性生产和使用，科学与政策之间的互动往往存在争议。这是有问题的，因为科学丰富决策的潜力没有得到充分利用。科学文献表明，这些问题与知识缺乏可信度、显著性和/或合法性有关。科学政策接口，如知识经纪人，建议通过促进产生可信的，突出的和合法的知识，加强科学政策的互动。然而，目前的科学辩论并没有明确哪些战略优先事项在解决哪些科学政策互动问题方面最有用，以及应该采用什么战略。基于深刻的文献综述，本文旨在通过提供概念清晰度和将典型的SPIs与不同的问题及其出现的背景联系起来，从而更好地理解SPIs。我们提出了一个实证研究议程，以测试有关SPIs的理论主张和我们自己的改进，并确定最佳实践。
Science-policy interactions are often contested, due to strategic production and use of knowledge. This is problematic because the potential of science to enrich decision-making is underexploited. Scientific literature suggests that these problems are related to a lack of credibility, salience and/or legitimacy of knowledge. Science-policy interfaces (SPIs), such as knowledge brokers, are suggested to enhance science-policy interactions by promoting the production of credible, salient and legitimate knowledge. However, the current scientific debate provides little clarity on which SPIs are most useful in solving which science-policy interaction problems and what strategies should be employed. Based on a profound literature review, this paper aims to arrive at a better understanding of SPIs, by providing conceptual clarity and linking typical SPIs to distinct problems and the contexts in which they emerge. We suggest an empirical research agenda to test theoretical claims about SPIs and our own refinements thereof, and to identify best practices.