The exclusion of benzodiazepine coverage in Medicare: Simple steps for avoiding a public health crisis
The exclusion of benzodiazepine coverage in Medicare: Simple steps for avoiding a public health crisis
复制标题
DOI:
10.1176/appi.ps.56.9.1143
复制
发表时间:
2005-09-01
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Soumerai, SB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bambauer, KZ;Sabin, JE;Soumerai, SB
Open Forum antianxiety medication with substantial toxicity, known for its overdose potential and its highly addictive and sedative properties (15), its use as an example is perplexing. In response to concerns about medications such as benzodiazepines that were excluded from the MMA, CMS issued a letter to state Medicaid directors on June 3, 2005 (16). The letter acknowledged the large gaps in MMA coverage and asked the Medicaid directors to help fix the problem by using state funds to cover medications that the MMA excludes. The letter specified, however, that if the state Medicaid program covers an excluded medication for Medicaid enrollees, it must cover the medication for dually eligible enrollees as well. Given that states will already be making “clawback” payments (monthly payments to the federal government for MMA coverage), it is unlikely that they will want to take financial responsibility for fixing the gaps in the MMA (17). On June 30, 2005, Representative Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.) introduced a bill (HR 3151)(18) cosponsored by Representative Jim Ramstad (R-Minn.) entitled “To Amend Part D of Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to Remove the Exclusion of Benzodiazepines From Required Coverage Under the Medicare Prescription Drug Program,” which was subsequently referred to the House Subcommittee on Health. Strong encouragement for this legislation came from the Medicare Rights Center, the Maine Benzodiazepine Study Group, and the Drug Policy Research Group at Harvard Medical School, and the national press covered the issue (19). The bill would remove the benzodiazepine exclusion in the MMA and provide for the review of prescription-filling policies for benzodiazepines by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ensure appropriate use, prevent abuse, and develop quality improvement and educational guidelines for benzodiazepine prescribing. The passage of this bill would ensure that the negative outcomes of the benzodiazepine exclusion from the MMA would be prevented. According to Nicholas Meyers, director of the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA’s) division of government relations, APA is very concerned about the negative impact that the exclusion could have on patients with mental illness; therefore APA is trying to find a regulatory or legislative solution to this problem (7), and this bill could be the solution that APA is looking for. The bill was also strongly supported by the American Medical Association (20) in response to prompts from the Maine Medical Association as well as from psychiatrists.