Institutional interaction in global environmental governance : synergy and conflict among international and EU policies
Institutional interaction in global environmental governance : synergy and conflict among international and EU policies
复制标题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Oberthür;Thom Gehring;O. Young
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Oberthür;Thom Gehring;O. Young
这种对国际和欧洲机构之间相互作用的系统调查提供了一个分析的理论框架，也是对这一基本上未知的研究领域的第一次广泛概述。通过提供详细的案例研究和系统的结果分析，本书考察了制度互动对环境治理的影响，并探讨了国际和欧盟政策相互加强或削弱的方式。在概念概述中，Oberthur和Gehring确定了制度互动影响环境治理的三种因果机制，10个案例研究应用了这一理论方法。六个案例以一个国际机构为起点，四个开始是欧洲联盟的一项法律的文书。所审查的国际制度包括广为人知的《濒危野生植物群和动植物种国际贸易公约》、《生物多样性公约》、世界贸易组织和《联合国气候变化框架公约》。分析的欧盟文书包括关于保护栖息地、故意向环境中释放转基因生物和空气质量的鲜为人知的指令。研究表明，尽管不同制度和机构之间确实存在冲突和干扰，但协同互动是常见的。关于这些结果的重要性及其背后机制的调查结果为学者和政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解。撰稿人：比阿特丽斯·查伊托、克莱尔·科菲、安德鲁·法默、托马斯·格林、约翰·兰奇贝里、塞巴斯蒂安·奥伯图尔、爱丽丝·帕尔默、G. Kristin Rosendal，Jon Birger Skjaerseth，Olav Schram斯托克，Ingmar von Homeyer，Jacob Werksman，Jorgen Wettestad
This systematic investigation of the interaction among international and European institutions provides both a theoretical framework for analysis and the first broad overview of this largely uncharted field of research. By offering detailed case studies and a systematic analysis of results, the book examines the effects of institutional interaction on environmental governance and explores the ways in which international and European Union policies can either reinforce or undercut one another.After a conceptual overview in which Oberthur and Gehring identify three causal mechanisms by which institutional interaction can affect environmental governance, ten case studies apply this theoretical approach. Six cases use an international institution as their starting point and four begin with a European Union legal instrument. The international regimes examined include the widely known Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES), Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and World Trade Organization and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The EU instruments analyzed include lesser-known directives on the protection of habitats, the deliberate release of genetically modified organisms into the environment, and air quality. The studies show that although conflict and interference among different regimes and institutions do take place, synergistic interactions are common. The findings on the importance of, and mechanisms behind, these outcomes offer valuable insights for both scholars and policymakers.Contributors:Beatrice Chaytor, Clare Coffey, Andrew Farmer, Thomas Gehring, John Lanchbery, Sebastian Oberthur, Alice Palmer, G. Kristin Rosendal, Jon Birger Skjaerseth, Olav Schram Stokke, Ingmar von Homeyer, Jacob Werksman, Jorgen Wettestad