EXAMINING THE STRUCTURE AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORT MEASURES OF DSM-5 ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR PERSONALITY DISORDERS CRITERION A
EXAMINING THE STRUCTURE AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORT MEASURES OF DSM-5 ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR PERSONALITY DISORDERS CRITERION A
复制标题
DOI：
10.1521/pedi_2021_35_531
复制
发表时间：
2022-04-01
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Dueber, David
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bliton, Chloe F.;Roche, Michael J.;Dueber, David
人格功能水平量表（LPFS）可操作化DSM-5人格障碍替代模型的标准A。尽管LPFS测量的发展和验证取得了进展，但缺乏研究，并且存在一些分歧，关于LPFS自我报告措施的结构，收敛和增量有效性。本研究旨在比较LPFS自我报告、LPFS标准A自我报告和LPFS简要表。内部结构进行了评估，通过主成分分析，因素分析，双因素分析的单维度。探讨了LPFS指标与病理和基本人格特征的关系。增量效度LPFS严重程度在预测病理人格结果控制的基本人格特质，反之亦然，进行了检查。结果表明，与其他病理性人格评估稳健相关的一维结构。LPFS严重程度和基本人格特质相互提供了独特的解释力。我们讨论了使用LPFS自我报告措施评估人格病理的影响。
The Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) operationalizes Criterion A of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Despite progress in LPFS measurement development and validation, there is a lack of research, and some disagreement, concerning structural, convergent, and incremental validity of LPFS self-report measures. The present study aimed to compare the LPFS Self-Report, LPFS Self-Report of Criterion A, and LPFS Brief Form. Internal structure was assessed through principal component analyses, factor analyses, and bifactor analyses of unidimensionality. Associations with both pathological and basic personality characteristics among the LPFS measures were explored. Incremental validity of LPFS severity in predicting pathological personality outcomes controlling for basic personality traits, and the reverse, were examined. Results suggest a unidimensional structure robustly associated with other pathological personality assessments. LPFS severity and basic personality traits mutually offered unique explanatory power. We discuss the implications of assessing personality pathology using LPFS self-report measures.