Regional Differences in Democratization: The East Versus the South
Regional Differences in Democratization: The East Versus the South
复制标题
民主化的地区差异：东方与南方
DOI：
10.1080/1060586x.1998.10641452
复制
发表时间：
1998
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Valerie J. Bunce
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Valerie J. Bunce
将这两种讨论联系在一起的是一个问题，这个问题可以简单地表述，但在实践中却极其难以回答。在比较分析中，“地方”的位置究竟是什么？更准确地说，是什么构成了语境语境有多不同语境差异在什么情况下违背了在相似与差异并存的比较研究中控制概念的核心假设？本文的目的是通过系统地研究民主化文献中突出的两个问题来解决这些问题，并提供一些试探性的答案，这两个问题呈现了东部和南部之间的明显对比，从而提供了一个机会来评估一个特定背景下的力量和具体后果，即地区。第一个问题是威权主义之后威权主义的影响。二是民主化与经济改革的关系。(摘录)
What unites these two discussions then is a question that can be stated simply but that is in practice devilishly difficult to answer. What precisely is the place of "place" in comparative analysis? Put more precisely: what constitutes context how distinct is context and at what point do contextual differences violate the assumption central to the notion of controls in comparative study of similarities existing alongside differences? The purpose of this article is to wrestle with these questions-and provide some tentative answers-by working systematically through two issues that figure prominently in the literature on democratization that present a clear contrast between the east and the south and that provide as a result an opportunity to assess the power and specific consequences of one context in particular-that is region. The first issue is the impact of the authoritarian past after authoritarianism. The other is the relationship between democratization and economic reform. (excerpt)