Traumatic Brain Injury and Driving Assessment: An Evidence-Based Literature Review
Traumatic Brain Injury and Driving Assessment: An Evidence-Based Literature Review
复制标题
DOI：
10.5014/ajot.63.5.580
复制
发表时间：
2009-09-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Waid-Ebbs, J. Kay
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Classen, Sherrilene;Levy, Charles;Waid-Ebbs, J. Kay
OBJECTIVE.我们对创伤性脑损伤（TBI）患者的驾驶表现评估工具进行了文献综述。数据来源为Web of Science、EBSCOhost、PubMed以及尚未在数据库中编目的专家和团队成员最近发表的文献。我们使用美国神经病学学会的分类标准从13项研究中提取数据，并为每项研究分配一个类别（I-IV，I是最高证据级别）。我们将主要研究分为驾驶评估类别（神经心理学;模拟器;越野;自我报告，其他报告和伤后残疾状态;综合驾驶评估），并综合这些工具的可预测性，因为它与TBI患者的驾驶表现有关。为了帮助临床医生和研究人员做出关于测试TBI患者驾驶性能的决定，我们提供了神经心理学测试的建议;越野测试;自我报告，其他报告和伤后残疾状态;以及全面的驾驶评估。
OBJECTIVE. We conducted a literature review of assessment tools predicting driving performance for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI).METHOD. Data sources were Web of Science, EBSCOhost, PubMed, and recently published literature from experts and team members not yet catalogued in the databases. We used the American Academy of Neurology's classification criteria to extract data from 13 studies, and we assigned a class (I-IV, with I being the highest level of evidence) to each study. We grouped primary studies into categories of driving assessment (neuropsychological; simulator; off-road; self-report, other report, and postinjury disability status; and comprehensive driving evaluation) and synthesized the predictability of these tools as it relates to driving performance for people with TBI.CONCLUSIONS. To assist clinicians and researchers in making decisions regarding testing the driving performance of people with TBI, we provide recommendations for neuropsychological tests; off-road tests; self-report, other report, and postinjury disability status; and comprehensive driving evaluation.