Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: Negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors

Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: Negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.854
复制
发表时间:
2006-08-01
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Wentura, Dirk
Wentura, Dirk
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Frings, Christian;Wentura, Dirk

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这是一个公认的,尽管令人困惑的发现,负启动(NP)取决于探针显示中干扰物的存在。在三个没有探针干扰的实验中,作者证明了基于初始和探针显示之间的偶然性的反应偏倚过程可能导致了这一发现。在标准NP实验中,对启动显示中的干扰物进行加工有助于准备对探测目标的反应。当这种偶然性被移除(实验2和3)时,在没有探针干扰的情况下,可以可靠地观察到NP,而如果设计包含典型的偶然性(实验1),则不会出现NP。因此,数据表明,在这些条件下通常观察到的NP的缺失可能是由于基于概率的成分。
It is an accepted, albeit puzzling finding that negative priming (NP) hinges on the presence of distractors in probe displays. In three experiments without probe distractors, the authors yielded evidence that response-biasing processes based on the contingency between prime and probe displays may have caused this finding. It is argued that it is of help in standard NP experiments to process the distractor in the prime display in order to prepare the response to the probe target. When this contingency was removed (Experiments 2 and 3), NP was reliably observed without probe distractors, whereas no NP emerged if the design contained the typical contingency (Experiment 1). For this reason, the data suggest that the absence of NP, which is usually observed under these conditions, may be due to a confingency-based component.