When member homogeneity is needed in work teams - A meta-analysis
When member homogeneity is needed in work teams - A meta-analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/104649640003100303
复制
发表时间：
2000-06-01
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Salas, E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bowers, CA;Pharmer, JA;Salas, E
对来自13项研究（567个团队，2,258名参与者）的57个效应量进行了荟萃分析整合，以确定在性别能力水平和个性方面同质的群体是否比在这些属性上异质的群体获得更高水平的表现。尽管个别研究经常显示同质和异质群体之间存在显着差异，但这种整合的结果表明，这些研究的综合效应量很小，但并不显着，有利于异质群体。IR似乎在许多纳入的研究中发现的显著影响可以归因于调查中使用的任务的类型和难度。团队建设的影响进行了讨论。
A meta-analytic integration of 57 effect sizes from 13 studies(567 teams, 2,258 participants) was performed to determine if groups that are homogeneous with respect to gender ability level, and personality achieve higher levels of performance than reams that are heterogeneous on these attributes. Although individual studies often show marked differences between homogeneous and heterogeneous groups, the results of this integration show the combined effect sizes of these studies to be small, though not significant, in favor of heterogeneous groups. Ir appears that the significant effects found in many of the included studies can be attributed to the type and difficulty of the task used in the investigation. Implications for team construction am discussed.