Consequences of Flexibility Stigma Among Academic Scientists and Engineers
Consequences of Flexibility Stigma Among Academic Scientists and Engineers
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0730888413515497
复制
发表时间：
2014-02-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Blair-Loy, Mary
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cech, Erin A.;Blair-Loy, Mary
灵活性耻辱，即对寻求或被认为需要灵活工作安排的工人的贬低，导致工作场所需求与专业人员需求之间的不匹配。作者对一所顶尖研究型大学的理想员工科学、技术、工程和数学教师进行了调查，以确定在带有灵活性耻辱的环境中工作的后果。那些报告这种耻辱的人坚持的意愿较低，工作与生活的平衡较差，工作满意度较低。这些后果不考虑性别和父母身份，这表明灵活性耻辱为许多教员营造了一个有问题的环境，即使是那些个人没有遭受耻辱风险的人。
Flexibility stigma, the devaluation of workers who seek or are presumed to need flexible work arrangements, fosters a mismatch between workplace demands and the needs of professionals. The authors survey ideal workersscience, technology, engineering, and math faculty at a top research universityto determine the consequences of working in an environment with flexibility stigma. Those who report this stigma have lower intentions to persist, worse work-life balance, and lower job satisfaction. These consequences are net of gender and parenthood, suggesting that flexibility stigma fosters a problematic environment for many faculty, even those not personally at risk of stigmatization.