What Is Revolutionary, What Remains the Same?
What Is Revolutionary, What Remains the Same?
复制标题
什么是革命性的，什么保持不变？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Arber Borici
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jorge Aranda;D. Damian;Arber Borici
大量的研究致力于实现模型驱动工程（MDE）的愿景。然而，向MDE过渡的组织的实践经验却被低估了.本文介绍了一个案例研究的组织后果经历了一个大型组织后，过渡到MDE。我们从案例研究中得出了四个结论。首先，MDE使开发更接近领域专家，但许多任务仍然需要软件工程师。其次，尽管MDE提供了一个实现生产力增量改进的机会，但软件开发的组织挑战仍然没有改变。第三，转向MDE可能会破坏组织结构的平衡，造成士气和权力问题。第四，MDE的文化和信息基础设施不发达，在MDE更好地建立之前，过渡组织需要付出额外的采用努力。基于这些发现，我们为研究人员和从业人员提供了一些相关的观察结果。
A considerable amount of research has been dedicated to bring the vision of model-driven engineering (MDE) to fruition. How- ever, the practical experiences of organizations that transition to MDE are underreported. This paper presents a case study of the organizational consequences experienced by one large organization after transitioning to MDE. We present four findings from our case study. First, MDE brings development closer to the domain experts, but software engineers are still necessary for many tasks. Second, though MDE presents an opportunity to achieve incremental improvements in productivity, the organizational challenges of software development remain unchanged. Third, switch- ing to MDE may disrupt the balance of the organizational structure, creating morale and power problems. Fourth, the cultural and institu- tional infrastructure of MDE is underdeveloped, and until MDE becomes better established, transitioning organizations need to exert additional adoption efforts. We offer several observations of relevance to researchers and practitioners based on these findings.