CHRONICITY AND THE GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE
CHRONICITY AND THE GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1192/bjp.146.1.55
复制
发表时间：
1985-01-01
影响因子：
10.5
通讯作者：
DUNCANJONES, P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
GOODCHILD, ME;DUNCANJONES, P
提出了一种新的Goldberg一般健康问卷评分方法。对于描述病理的项目，回答“不超过平常”应被视为慢性疾病的指标，而不是健康状况良好的指标，并相应地对这些回答进行评分。有证据表明，这组反应与神经性疾病的其他措施有关，并且修订后的评分比传统评分提供了更好的病例预测。修正后的评分与特质神经质的相关性更强，且在重复测量中更稳定。对于大多数研究和流行病学目的，建议优先使用它而不是传统的评分。
A new scoring for Goldberg''s General Health Questionnaire is proposed. The response ''no more than usual'', to an item describing pathology, should be treated as an indicator of chronic illness rather than of good health, and these responses are scored accordingly. Evidence is given that this set of responses is associated with other measures of neurotic illness and that the revised scoring provides a better prediction of caseness than the conventional scoring. The revised scoring is more strongly associated with trait neuroticism, and is more stable in repeated measurement. It is recommended in preference to the conventional scoring for most research and epidemiological purposes.