Split morphology: How agglutination and flexion mix
Split morphology: How agglutination and flexion mix
复制标题
分裂形态：凝集和屈曲如何混合
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Frans Plank
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Frans Plank
AGGLUTINATIVE或FLEXIVE不是整个语言的属性，也不是简单的属性。有一系列简单的性质，它们在逻辑上都是相互独立的，主要包括分离/累积和不变性/方差。它们都是独立的词形的属性，而且在逻辑上也没有必要让它们的属性集合一致。这为语言内部的异质性和语言之间的多样性创造了巨大的潜力，如果意识到这一点，将使形态类型学变得不可行。然而，检查分裂之间的分离和累积和之间的不变性和方差沿着线的词类，在单个词类的子集，形态类别，和类别的条款之间的分裂表明，凝集和弯曲之间的混合物，虽然五花八门，不是随机的。如果发现语法的异质性较低，语言的多样性较低，这可能是由于普遍的、永恒的原则或变化的偶然性。两者都对形态系统的形成起着重要作用。
Being AGGLUTINATIVE or FLEXIVE are not properties of entire languages, nor are they simple properties. There is a whole ränge of simple properties, all logically independent ofeach other, prominently including those ofseparation/cumulation and invariance/variance. They are all properties ofindividual wordforms, and again there is no logical necessityfor these to agree in their property sets. This creates a huge potential for heterogeneity within andfor diversity across languages, which, if realized to the fall, would render morphological typology unviable. However, an examination ofsplits between Separation and cumulation and between invariance and variance along the lines ofword-classes, ofsubsets within single word-classes, of morphological categories, and ofterms ofcategories suggests that mixtures between agglutination and flexion, though multifarious, are not random. Ifgrammars arefound to be less heterogeneous, and languages less diverse, than they could be, this can be due to universal, timeless principles or to regularities ofchange. Both play a wie in shaping morphological Systems.