Class Position of Immigrant Workers in a Post-Industrial Economy: The Dutch Case
Class Position of Immigrant Workers in a Post-Industrial Economy: The Dutch Case
复制标题
后工业经济中移民工人的阶级地位：荷兰案例
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Leerkes
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Snel;J. Burgers;A. Leerkes
在本文中，不断变化的劳动力市场的机会和少数群体成员在先进的服务经济体的地位的问题是解决，重点是荷兰的情况。我们区分两个社会阶层，一个传统的“福特主义”的职业和后福特主义的职业之一。与本土荷兰人相比，所有移民群体在劳动力市场的底层都有过多的代表性，无论是在福特主义者还是在后工业阶层。在1990年代，随着移民更多地参与劳动力市场，灵活劳动合同的数量也大幅度增加。荷兰本地人也更经常地以灵活的劳动合同工作，但程度不如移民。在工业化后的职业中就业的拉美人、安的列斯人和其他非西方移民的职业水平较低，可归因于他们的教育水平低。然而，对于土耳其人、马达加斯加人和其他从事福特主义职业的非西方移民来说，情况并非如此。他们的职业水平低不能完全用他们的教育水平低来解释。经济结构的变化对各族裔群体的影响各不相同，取决于他们过去的就业情况、文化资本和他们必须在其中运作的体制框架。
In this paper, the issue of changing labour-market opportunities and the position of members of minority groups in advanced service economies is addressed, focusing on the Dutch case. We distinguish between two social hierarchies, one of traditional ‘fordist’ occupations and one of post-fordist occupations. Compared to the native Dutch, all immigrant groups are over-represented at the bottom of the labour market, both in the fordist and in the post-industrial hierarchy. Increased immigrant labour-market participation in the 1990s was accompanied by a strong rise in the number of flexible labour contracts. Native Dutch also work more frequently on flexible labour contracts, but not to the same extent as immigrants. The lower occupational level of the Surinamese, Antilleans and other non-Western immigrants employed in post-industrial occupations can be attributed to their low educational level. This is not true, however, for Turks, Moroccans and other non-Western immigrants employed in fordist occupations. Their low occupational level can not be completely explained by their low educational level. The effects of changes in the economic structure differ for ethnic groups, depending on their past employment, their cultural capital and the institutional framework in which they have to operate.