Effort testing in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: validity indicator profile and test of memory malingering performance characteristics.
Effort testing in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: validity indicator profile and test of memory malingering performance characteristics.
复制标题
精神分裂症和分裂情感障碍的努力测试：有效性指标概况和记忆欺骗表现特征测试。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Brittany Bascetta
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Hunt;J. Root;Brittany Bascetta
虽然有效性指标配置文件（VIP）和记忆伪装测试（TOMM）的目的是限制实际的认知功能障碍对成功的表现的影响，认知功能障碍在多大程度上发挥作用的努力评估应在不同的临床组进行验证。迄今为止，很少有研究已经进行了VIP的表现，在个人诊断为精神障碍。对54例精神分裂症或情感性精神障碍患者进行VIP、TOMM、简明精神状态测验和广泛成就测验-4阅读分测验。特异性率进行了比较测试，与规范性数据，并与发表的特异性率在精神病样本。结果表明，使用VIP与精神病患者，将产生增加无效的性能配置文件，而TOMM是更有弹性的，在这个人群中。值得注意的是，精神状态和估计的智力是预测分类的VIP言语分测验和TOMM。
While the Validity Indicator Profile (VIP) and the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) are designed to limit the influence of actual cognitive impairment on successful performance, the extent to which cognitive dysfunction does play a role in the assessment of effort should be verified in distinct clinical groups. To date, little research has been conducted on VIP performance in individuals diagnosed with a psychotic disorder. Fifty-four patients with either schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were administered the VIP, TOMM, Short Test of Mental Status, and the Wide Range Achievement Test-4 Reading subtest. Specificity rates were compared between tests, with normative data, and with published specificity rates in psychiatric samples. Results indicate that the use of the VIP with psychotic-disordered individuals will generate increased invalid performance profiles, whereas the TOMM is more resilient in this population. Significantly, mental status and estimated intellectual ability were predictive of classifications on the VIP Verbal subtest and the TOMM.
迟发性精神病性抑郁症的脑损伤和认知功能。
DOI：
10.1176/jnp.3.1.33
发表时间：
1991
期刊：
The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lesser,IM;Miller,BL;Boone,KB;Hill-Gutierrez,E;Mehringer,CM;Wong,K;Mena,I
通讯作者：
Mena,I