yy TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis

yy TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/hel.13007
复制
发表时间:
2023-07-15
期刊:
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Hu, Yi
Hu, Yi
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Du, Ren-Chun;Zhang, Yang;Hu, Yi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景幽门螺杆菌(helicobacter pylori, H. pylori)与胃部疾病密切相关,在中国具有较高的患病率。公共平台被认为是发布幽门螺杆菌相关信息的常见且重要的工具。本研究旨在评估和比较抖音和哔哩哔哩上与幽门螺杆菌相关的视频的内容和质量。材料与方法在TikTok和Bilibili平台上以“h.p ylori”为关键词进行检索。上传的来源分为营利组织、一般用户、卫生专业人员、新闻机构、非营利组织和科学传播者。采用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)、全球质量量表(GQS)和修改后的DISCERN评分来评估所纳入视频的质量。结果共纳入并分析了93个TikTok视频和79个Bilibili视频。TikTok视频的持续时间明显短于Bilibili视频(分别为64秒和149秒,p < 0.001)。视频时长与改进后的DISCERN和GQS得分呈正相关(p < 0.001, r = 0.388和r = 0.437)。在医疗专业人员和非营利组织中,TikTok视频的JAMA和修改后的DISCERN得分明显高于其他来源(p < 0.05)。对于Bilibili,科学传播者的JAMA评分显著高于其他视频来源(p < 0.001)。新闻机构上传的视频的观看量、评论量、分享量和收藏量均高于其他机构或个人(p < 0.001)。结论在中国,来自抖音和哔哩哔哩的幽门螺杆菌相关视频更倾向于提供有关幽门螺杆菌传播和根除的信息。然而,许多视频在内容和质量上得分一般,需要改进。我们建议公众通过卫生专业人员、非营利组织和科学传播者上传的视频获取幽门螺杆菌相关信息。
BackgroundHelicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is closely associated with gastric diseases and has a high prevalence in China. Public platforms are considered common and important tools to publicize H. pylori-related information. This study aimed to assess and compare the content and quality of H. pylori-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili.Materials and MethodsA search was performed on the TikTok and Bilibili platforms using the keyword "H. pylori". The source of upload was categorized as for-profit organizations, general users, health professionals, news agencies, nonprofit organizations, and science communicators. The Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), Global Quality Scale (GQS), and modified DISCERN scores were used to evaluate the quality of the included videos.ResultsA total of 93 TikTok videos and 79 Bilibili videos were included and analyzed. TikTok videos had a significantly shorter duration than Bilibili videos (64 vs. 149 s, respectively; p < 0.001). The duration of the video showed a positive correlation with the modified DISCERN and GQS scores (p < 0.001, r = 0.388 and r = 0.437, respectively). The JAMA and modified DISCERN scores of the TikTok video were significantly higher in health professionals and nonprofit organizations than in other sources (p < 0.05). For Bilibili, science communicators had a significantly higher JAMA score than the other video sources (p < 0.001). The videos uploaded by news agencies received more views, comments, shares, and favorites than any other organization or individual (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn China, H. pylori-related videos from TikTok and Bilibili tended to provide the information regarding the transmission and eradication of H. pylori. However, many videos scored an average rating in content and quality and need to be improved. We recommend that the public obtain H. pylori-related information through videos uploaded by health professionals, nonprofit organizations, and science communicators.