DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH GENETICALLY HETEROGENEOUS RAT STOCK
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL-INSTITUTES-OF-HEALTH GENETICALLY HETEROGENEOUS RAT STOCK
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1530-0277.1984.tb05706.x
复制
发表时间:
1984-01-01
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
SPUHLER, K
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
HANSEN, C;SPUHLER, K
METHODSThe basic scheme followed in the formation of the stock, N/Nih, was an eight-way cross of separate inbred strains. Eight strains were chosen since this number allowed a greater sampling of the rat gene pool from available laboratory populations. Moreover, using this number of strains would also increase the distribution of genotypic frequencies in the base population according to the binomial expansion. For example, if only two strains, each homozygous for different alleles at one gene locus, were used, three different genotypes would be produced. Increasing the num-ber of strains to eight, each homozygous for different alleles, produces nine different genotypes for one gene locus. Summing these genotypic differences over many gene loci yields an extremely large number of genetic combinations present in the heterogeneous stock. Using eight strains required three generations to complete the breeding program. An important decision in developing this stock of rats was selecting the eight strains for inclusion in the breeding program. Although there are probably more than 100 inbred strains of rats today, many trace their origin to the Wistar Moreover, since the origin of a number of strains is obscure, it is often difficult to establish whether they, in fact, do have an origin independent of the Wistar stock. After extensive consideration, the following strains were chosen to serve as progenitors of the heterogeneous stock: BN/SsN, MR/N, BUF/N, M520/N, WN/N, ACI/N, WKY/N, and F344/N. A number of factors contributed to the choice of these particular strains: they represented a relatively broad spectrum of laboratory rat genomic differences; at least some were of independent origin; and, finally, they were readily available. Three of the strains, MR/N, WN/N, and WKY/N, trace their ancestry to the original Wistar stock. However, the MR/N strain was developed from a subsequent European stock,’the WKY/N from a Japanese stock,’and the WN/N from a secondary American stock. The M520/N and F344/N strains were established in the 1920s from dealer stocks, but their ultimate origin is unknown. The ACI/N strain resulted from a hybrid between the August and Copenhagen strains, and the BN/SsN strain traces its origin to a color mutant in a stock of wild rats maintained at the Wistar In~ titute.~.‘The actual pairing of strain types for the mating system in each generation were as follows. The first generation of matings consisted of BN/SsN x MR/N, BUF/N x M52O/N, WN/N x ACI/N, and WKY/N x F344/N. No strains of common origin were crossed in this generation. The offspring produced were F, animals such that all progeny from a particular cross were identical heterozygotes. The second cycle of matings to produce the Fz generation was as follows: BN-MR X BUF-M520 and WN-ACI x WKY-F344. Only a limited number of F, mating was made to produce the F2 generation, since each set of parents was genetically identical. The F, generation was produced by the mating of BN-MRBUF-M520 x WN-ACl-WKY-F344. In this case, 70 female and 70 male progeny were chosen at random from the BN-MR-BUF-M52O and from the WN-ACl-WKY-F344 groups to make reciprocal crosses. The choice of this particular number of mating pairs was predicated on the decision as to the final colony size. A rule of thumb for managing outbred stocks is to produce the largest colony size possible consistent with available resources. In this case, it was determined that 60 pairs would represent the best compromise between available resources and minimizing the inevitable cumulative inbreeding that occurs in a closedcolony situation. The additional 10 mating were included to …