College student reactions to health warning labels: Sociodemographic and psychosocial factors related to perceived effectiveness of different approaches
College student reactions to health warning labels: Sociodemographic and psychosocial factors related to perceived effectiveness of different approaches
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.09.006
复制
发表时间：
2011-12-01
影响因子：
5.1
通讯作者：
Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Berg, Carla J.;Thrasher, James F.;Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.
客观的。研究将不同类型的图形香烟健康警示标签视为最有效激励吸烟者戒烟或防止大学生吸烟的相关因素。方法。 2010 年秋季，我们对东南六所大学的 24,055 名学生进行了一项在线调查。我们从 2600 个结果中获得了当前分析的完整数据。目前吸烟率为23.5%。大多数人（78.6%）一致认为恐怖图像最有效。 19.5% 的人认为见证图像最有效，只有少数人认为标准图像（1.6%）或人类痛苦图像（0.3%）最有效。随后的分析重点关注那些认可可怕图像或推荐最有效的人之间的差异。将推荐与恐怖图像列为最有效的相关因素包括女性（p
Objective. To examine factors associated with perceiving different types of pictorial cigarette health warning labels as most effective in motivating smokers to quit or preventing smoking initiation among college students.Method. We administered an online survey to 24,055 students attending six Southeast colleges in Fall, 2010. We obtained complete data for the current analyses from 2600.Results. Current smoking prevalence was 23.5%. The largest majority (78.6%) consistently rated gruesome images as most effective. 19.5% rated testimonial images as most effective, and only a sinal proportion rated either standard (1.6%) or human suffering images (0.3%) as most effective. Subsequent analyses focused on differences between those endorsing gruesome images or testimonials as most effective. Factors related to ranking testimonials versus gruesome images as most effective included being female (p