Pre-registration in social psychology-A discussion and suggested template
Pre-registration in social psychology-A discussion and suggested template
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jesp.2016.03.004
复制
发表时间：
2016-11-01
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Giner-Sorolla, Roger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
van 't Veer, Anna Elisabeth;Giner-Sorolla, Roger
对研究人员来说，在进行研究之前进行预注册最近变得更加可行，而且越来越多的期刊也鼓励这样做。然而，由于预注册的实践对心理科学来说是比较新的，因此对注册内容的具体指导还处于形成阶段。在简要介绍了医学和心理学研究中预注册的历史之后，我们概述了两种不同的模型，可以应用于审查预注册和未经审查的预注册，并讨论了每种模型对科学整体的优势。个别科学家，以及他们的一些缺点和局限性。最后，我们提出并证明了一个可以促进预注册的拟议标准模板。研究人员可以在编辑之前和编辑过程中使用该模板，以满足文章要求并增强其学术工作的稳健性。(C) 2016 Elsevier Inc.版权所有。
Pre-registration of studies before they are conducted has recently become more feasible for researchers, and is encouraged by an increasing number of journals. However, because the practice of pre-registration is relatively new to psychological science, specific guidelines for the content of registrations are still in a formative stage. After giving a brief history of pre-registration in medical and psychological research, we outline two different models that can be applied reviewed and unreviewed pre-registration and discuss the advantages of each model to science as a whole and to.the individual scientist, as well as some of their drawbacks and limitations. Finally, we present and justify a proposed standard template that can facilitate pre-registration. Researchers can use the template before and during the editorial process to meet article requirements and enhance the robustness of their scholarly efforts. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.