Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2?: A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading
Do readers obtain preview benefit from word n+2?: A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.230
复制
发表时间：
2007-02-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Brown, Sarah J.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rayner, Keith;Juhasz, Barbara J.;Brown, Sarah J.
两个实验分别测试了阅读中串行词汇加工和并行分布眼动控制模型的预测结果。边界范式（K. Rayner，1975），并且边界位置被设置在单词n-i（刚好在目标单词的左侧的单词）的结尾处或单词n - 2的结尾处。串行词汇加工模型预测，只有当边界设置在单词n -1时（当目标单词将是下一个固定的单词时），才应该有预览益处，而当边界设置在单词n - 2时，没有预览益处。另一方面，平行词汇模型预测，在这两种情况下应该有一些预览的好处。与串行词汇加工模型的预测一致，当边界设置在单词n - 2的末尾时，对目标单词没有预览益处。此外，没有证据表明存在视网膜旁对中央凹的影响。
Two experiments tested predictions derived from serial lexical processing and parallel distributed models of eye movement control in reading. The boundary paradigm (K. Rayner, 1975) was used, and the boundary location was set either at the end of word n - I (the word just to the left of the target word) or at the end of word n - 2. Serial lexical processing models predict that there should be preview benefit only when the boundary is set at word n - I (when the target word will be the next word fixated) and no preview benefit when the boundary is set at word n - 2. Parallel lexical models, on the other hand, predict that there should be some preview benefit in both situations. Consistent with the predictions of the serial lexical processing models, there was no preview benefit for a target word when the boundary was set at the end of word n - 2. Furthermore, there was no evidence of parafoveal-on-foveal effects.